RE: [bmwg] Is the BMWG a proper home for this I-D?ch

sporetsky@quarrytech.com Tue, 05 October 2004 15:40 UTC

Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA08546 for <bmwg-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Oct 2004 11:40:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CErP3-0001wS-C9; Tue, 05 Oct 2004 11:39:01 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CErGc-0000fd-Vg for bmwg@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2004 11:30:19 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA07803 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Oct 2004 11:30:16 -0400 (EDT)
From: sporetsky@quarrytech.com
Received: from email.quarrytech.com ([4.17.144.4] helo=qtech1.quarrytech.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CErPv-0005pp-Bx for bmwg@ietf.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2004 11:39:56 -0400
Received: by email.quarrytech.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <N87X5ARK>; Tue, 5 Oct 2004 11:29:45 -0400
Message-ID: <496A8683261CD211BF6C0008C733261A04D3B028@email.quarrytech.com>
To: riw@cisco.com, jim.mcquaid@netiq.com
Subject: RE: [bmwg] Is the BMWG a proper home for this I-D?ch
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 11:29:45 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9466e0365fc95844abaf7c3f15a05c7d
Cc: hcb@gettcomm.com, sporetsky@quarrytech.com, bmwg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: bmwg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: bmwg-bounces@ietf.org

I think that before selecting the core document of a BCP effort we would
need to scope and outline the BCP effort.  Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: Russ White [mailto:ruwhite@cisco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 11:24 AM
To: Jim McQuaid
Cc: sporetsky@quarrytech.com; hcb@gettcomm.com; bmwg@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [bmwg] Is the BMWG a proper home for this I-D?ch



> Isn't there a "best practices" genre of RFC which might pertain?

Actually, you've hit the nail on the head. What would hte WG think of 
taking on creating a BCP for testing, and using this doc as the core of 
that effort? That fits what this doc is driving at better than an 
informational, and it certainly doesn't fit into the concept of an actual 
set of tests, defined, etc.

Thoughts?

:-)

Russ


__________________________________
riw@cisco.com CCIE <>< Grace Alone

_______________________________________________
bmwg mailing list
bmwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg