IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [bmwg] Is the BMWG a proper home for this I-D?

"Howard C. Berkowitz" <hcb@gettcomm.com> Tue, 05 October 2004 23:36 UTC

Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA23906 for <bmwg-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Oct 2004 19:36:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CEye2-0005PQ-PX; Tue, 05 Oct 2004 19:22:58 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CEyd8-0005A6-HH for bmwg@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2004 19:22:02 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA22827 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Oct 2004 19:21:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net ([204.127.198.39]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CEymV-00073J-Bf for bmwg@ietf.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2004 19:31:44 -0400
Received: from [192.168.0.4] (pcp09296126pcs.arlngt01.va.comcast.net[69.143.165.226]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with ESMTP id <20041005232129015004lvlie> (Authid: hcb8); Tue, 5 Oct 2004 23:21:29 +0000
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Sender: hcb8@smtp.comcast.net
Message-Id: <p06110415bd88dcb3b421@[192.168.0.4]>
In-Reply-To: <20041005231733.62400C7D72@newdev.harvard.edu>
References: <20041005231733.62400C7D72@newdev.harvard.edu>
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 19:21:18 -0400
To: sob@harvard.edu
From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" <hcb@gettcomm.com>
Subject: RE: [bmwg] Is the BMWG a proper home for this I-D?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 68c8cc8a64a9d0402e43b8eee9fc4199
Cc: bmwg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: bmwg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: bmwg-bounces@ietf.org

At 7:17 PM -0400 10/5/04, scott bradner wrote:
>for what its worth, as one who helped make the decision
>
>bmwg was for boxes, ippm was for networks
>
>yes, bmwg has morphed over time but I do not think that ippm has
>
>Scott

Which brings up the question: where does a box belong when its 
performance can be tested only by interaction with other like boxes 
(i.e., iBGP)?

_______________________________________________
bmwg mailing list
bmwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email