IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-sedhcpv6-02 - Respond by May 18

神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp> Tue, 03 June 2014 21:06 UTC

Return-Path: <jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB0D1A01A8 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 14:06:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l3Zaae_HV1Pc for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 14:06:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x234.google.com (mail-wg0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DB571A0370 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 14:06:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id l18so7318542wgh.23 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 14:06:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=mLP/F+tGH6mgG2tckzlfMBbbwVslK5UHNeKdT45DQwE=; b=TAwkUaD3PQ4S/QElCOHApQV+cgpDoOeRzTY2b3uheBVv8WuJi8d/qvo9OkkNftJTMP J5X+0mSPBueDusO9mGk+5cd3c5OtFGK6FIXEFFpbAckzJwlyYJQNjKk79L7GRAMqUQJ8 QG3D/cyUzsMl4R/RcJsYpwOtUddbnOGlZ/DLTnN+4G3Q2/06Olzen8XsnUF9FBvh6YCj VcEpeUHJ2GfoA1rkRI7MZ+wVjaT+KZq4HQXQJOFEIniFXgkA6ekekqYqU7o8iRgM9N6M yGn7R0aIEl67QZFiQrUrABi+Z8o+XUlN7+dvx/awPYX53bk4T9dIcnR7cNl8tskAdcaR orZg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.57.208 with SMTP id k16mr63714953wjq.51.1401829609859; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 14:06:49 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com
Received: by 10.194.222.7 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 14:06:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <C7C8884E-499D-4B55-B978-8D7A4D21EE3C@nominum.com>
References: <535FEDAD.5010103@gmail.com> <5388F901.1000709@gmail.com> <78B235AF-D94C-40F1-9C76-4159B3A0A043@nominum.com> <CAJE_bqf4UZeFifHMhM=Vo2X66+ab7cnhb19K-XD_+_pr7-VS1A@mail.gmail.com> <FF49B4DE-E45F-4FF7-9C2D-5FA72FE66A4D@gmail.com> <C7C8884E-499D-4B55-B978-8D7A4D21EE3C@nominum.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 14:06:49 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: hrfnFosqLwzsxumG9-doW9J_JIE
Message-ID: <CAJE_bqcLZCRvZM1-rTx67KVRT926sLTsb9ozEi+8CXA1rRoC8g@mail.gmail.com>
From: 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
To: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/3UKzPQUW8EgjnkW2Gl8gWBqxcu0
Cc: dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>, Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-sedhcpv6-02 - Respond by May 18
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 21:06:59 -0000

At Mon, 2 Jun 2014 16:52:54 -0400,
Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> wrote:

> I have no personal objection to Jinmei's text, although I think it's
> incomplete.   Could you guys work with Sheng to see if you can come
> up with a mutually agreeable update?

I'm happy to do that.  I've seen a followup message from the draft
authors with the plan of starting the discussion, so I think we can
continue this topic there.

--
JINMEI, Tatuya

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email