IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-sedhcpv6-02 - Respond by May 18

"Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> Wed, 07 May 2014 18:51 UTC

Return-Path: <volz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D57651A07CA for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 May 2014 11:51:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.152
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.152 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SyBZBDPO7pXr for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 May 2014 11:51:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75D1F1A0268 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 May 2014 11:51:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1098; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1399488678; x=1400698278; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=biYkj9SmCBhiuZd/8yaVBlsJD9/DwsSPsuiaiDB0SOY=; b=DKi9r9KOZtV4FvT4D5j52Ndqg1btWKMzypQCSUwmu9MfXRciDcG157j2 rBevief+eG+/voGiRXjVbrphIRpj0PISo0DdEAMBuQsqU+ziCD3rg61hd AJ5YDHwi4c2F9Uz1mJeSdfcfEcZnEdBauvuzOSrdu7cS1SA7m5f2p34C8 s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhwFAK9/alOtJV2Y/2dsb2JhbABagwZPWIJnunyHPAGBHBZ0giUBAQEEAQEBHgFMBAcMBAIBCBEEAQEBAQMGBRgCAwInCxQJCAIEDgUIiDkNjjKcGQGlPBeBJ4ocgl4xBwaCazmBFQSEWgKnVoM0bQEBAYE/
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,1005,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="322918463"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 May 2014 18:51:18 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x13.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x13.cisco.com [173.37.183.87]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s47IpI5T012065 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 7 May 2014 18:51:18 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.140]) by xhc-rcd-x13.cisco.com ([173.37.183.87]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Wed, 7 May 2014 13:51:17 -0500
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-sedhcpv6-02 - Respond by May 18
Thread-Index: AQHPag0KHMzNFfxEIk6wcBa/GM4ndJs1oYkAgAAGu4D//7E7YIAAby6A//+thtA=
Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 18:51:16 +0000
Message-ID: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1B00F1F6@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
References: <535FEDAD.5010103@gmail.com> <CAJE_bqen37j5UCsKZj6syVyvk2Xed4V_xGp-t4xY8shjmS+H5g@mail.gmail.com> <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1B008430@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <4F2473AB-E8F7-4620-874C-3DCA59E70DE5@gmail.com> <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B923AE431FB@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1B00BAC1@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <9A6A9452-AF57-4EE1-9401-E0CE26922E6B@gmail.com> <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B923AE438BE@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <4891B713-5C8E-414A-99D7-64869C2E6F3A@gmail.com> <CAJE_bqc+qofsHEHZyuG7UotHmZ170OuFoUzz13hz7Rj_8V5FsA@mail.gmail.com> <87A01A92-7517-40A4-8DD0-EE29AADA4AF6@nominum.com> <CAJE_bqeKYoRzVxSgJHg2Ud6H2qEZGaEdFyD=4Ps84NTFyOdELA@mail.gmail.com> <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1B00EF3B@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <074EF8DF-6404-4D90-B56C-6955A3939A6D@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <074EF8DF-6404-4D90-B56C-6955A3939A6D@nominum.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [161.44.70.121]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/MMQSaW-iT5QW48_E--fdLRdHhuU
Cc: dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>, 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>, Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-sedhcpv6-02 - Respond by May 18
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 18:51:24 -0000

Here's some documentation from IBM (google found this - 2nd in list when searching for IPV6_USE_MIN_MTU):

http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/zos/v1r12/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.ibm.zos.r12.hale001%2Fipv6d0151000614.htm

There are plenty of other links -- About 10,100 results (0.25 seconds).

- Bernie

-----Original Message-----
From: dhcwg [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ted Lemon
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 2:45 PM
To: Bernie Volz (volz)
Cc: dhcwg; 神明達哉; Ralph Droms
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-sedhcpv6-02 - Respond by May 18

On May 7, 2014, at 12:11 PM, Bernie Volz (volz) <volz@cisco.com> wrote:
> Do we see any harm in using IPV6_USE_MIN_MTU?

I would like to hear a description of the actual benefit it would confer.   I suspect there is none.   I can't find any documentation for the option using google, and the only discussion I find about it is in relation to BIND 10.

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email