Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-sedhcpv6-02 - Respond by May 18

Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 04 June 2014 12:37 UTC

Return-Path: <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 794761A01D2 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 05:37:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RE4nJfbZIfZ1 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 05:37:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-x22c.google.com (mail-qg0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEA8D1A01B9 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 05:37:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qg0-f44.google.com with SMTP id i50so15571094qgf.3 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 Jun 2014 05:37:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=HhKfwwU0VsgzvbuOjNWdA8xj8nmxP429z7URkhM4iVI=; b=kYgm5PtvnI0vflnhWGSXipfSS6FF1XLHIAxMS9hdu9lp46HgAWFEQp1VuiCVpa1+YG Nl8fbV4Wi7WDnVEyCMayV3lFmGuHeuTQS9B6+Y8DVxGu4825FQO4vubM0Fj1j+v7+bWG Nf3nMC/pfdorFAlks2lP0EjVkG/qWObd8N/b7LGwCCKDBjEo4lsMBOuXKLUy8AGeGFwF ToxXWawy4N0da7ZhZf7hugCH/IGbq+MNQvzw4kc6E22XJhydOUP54N9Dlrpnmyx1pTAS tznDiVAhX0dxtD5i/6NF91LWXvqqm1F7nBP5+6AgDfcc/qRSxp/JdUMwGTJB5Z0PR7uh gU+Q==
X-Received: by 10.140.25.37 with SMTP id 34mr67369115qgs.60.1401885444319; Wed, 04 Jun 2014 05:37:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:420:2481:20:6ce4:3700:86c8:1597? ([2001:420:2481:20:6ce4:3700:86c8:1597]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id d9sm3977009qac.15.2014.06.04.05.37.20 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Jun 2014 05:37:21 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.2\))
From: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJE_bqcLZCRvZM1-rTx67KVRT926sLTsb9ozEi+8CXA1rRoC8g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 08:37:19 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5F38B14A-07F6-4788-B82A-159CEF99EF32@gmail.com>
References: <535FEDAD.5010103@gmail.com> <5388F901.1000709@gmail.com> <78B235AF-D94C-40F1-9C76-4159B3A0A043@nominum.com> <CAJE_bqf4UZeFifHMhM=Vo2X66+ab7cnhb19K-XD_+_pr7-VS1A@mail.gmail.com> <FF49B4DE-E45F-4FF7-9C2D-5FA72FE66A4D@gmail.com> <C7C8884E-499D-4B55-B978-8D7A4D21EE3C@nominum.com> <CAJE_bqcLZCRvZM1-rTx67KVRT926sLTsb9ozEi+8CXA1rRoC8g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lemon Ted <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.2)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/VV3LJP-ESdahWgdA-fRysYoElFY
Cc: dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>, 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-sedhcpv6-02 - Respond by May 18
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 12:37:32 -0000

On Jun 3, 2014, at 5:06 PM 6/3/14, 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp> wrote:

> At Mon, 2 Jun 2014 16:52:54 -0400,
> Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> wrote:
> 
>> I have no personal objection to Jinmei's text, although I think it's
>> incomplete.   Could you guys work with Sheng to see if you can come
>> up with a mutually agreeable update?
> 
> I'm happy to do that.  I've seen a followup message from the draft
> authors with the plan of starting the discussion, so I think we can
> continue this topic there.

I'll participate in that discussion, as well.

- Ralph

> 
> --
> JINMEI, Tatuya