IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] Call for Adoption: draft-yeh-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-pool-opt-08

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Mon, 10 September 2012 03:05 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97F1921F8505 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Sep 2012 20:05:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.546
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.546 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.053, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vpL+CvQUYwCx for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Sep 2012 20:05:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og117.obsmtp.com (exprod7og117.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01F1621F84EC for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 Sep 2012 20:05:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob117.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUE1Y9VVa6cX87LNrdxBy++HAmIJlasGF@postini.com; Sun, 09 Sep 2012 20:05:26 PDT
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 195941B84AC for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 Sep 2012 20:05:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-01.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1120819005C for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 Sep 2012 20:05:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
Received: from MBX-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.133]) by CAS-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.131]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Sun, 9 Sep 2012 20:05:18 -0700
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
To: "dhcwg@ietf.org WG" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] Call for Adoption: draft-yeh-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-pool-opt-08
Thread-Index: AQHNgg2f2GWemYRp/0G7NT9hbKcz65eDc3KA
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 03:05:17 +0000
Message-ID: <03595D60-FAA0-41A5-B3AE-446F839E92FB@nominum.com>
References: <91484F36-D059-4D90-8BFE-60434864A579@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <91484F36-D059-4D90-8BFE-60434864A579@nominum.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.168.1.10]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <6E49A49959D3AD42B7F6A6107AABAF12@nominum.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Call for Adoption: draft-yeh-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-pool-opt-08
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 03:05:26 -0000

On Aug 24, 2012, at 11:32 AM, Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> wrote:
> If you think this work should be adopted by the working group, please reply to this message saying so.   If you think this work should not be adopted by the working group, please reply to this message saying so.   We will evaluate consensus on September 7.

There were a few comments, and I think there's at least one person who opposed adopting this work, and perhaps two others who are on the fence about it but didn't say specifically.   But there are also seven people in favor of adopting the work.   Since this is a call for adoption, and not a working group last call, I think that this means that there is a rough consensus that we should do this work.   Hopefully the people who had comments will work with Leaf to improve the draft.

Thanks!

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email