Re: [dhcwg] Call for Adoption: draft-yeh-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-pool-opt-08

"Gaurav Halwasia (ghalwasi)" <ghalwasi@cisco.com> Sat, 25 August 2012 00:54 UTC

Return-Path: <ghalwasi@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E14E821F85FC for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 17:54:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.44
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.44 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.159, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2vmxqgbSONqG for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 17:54:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 100B521F85AC for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 17:54:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=ghalwasi@cisco.com; l=1528; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1345856084; x=1347065684; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=Xv3J9hoVJPTyUGCh2etW4yJg50xAP/F9gClxmMHMgww=; b=JXV+fdKDbCgwZJQw9z8xK9mYWU51AfxLK9MRFVmReEflrtS2skxh0nVd iads7+MzP/Q7N7+RMjcpwn6/bhZVNo+/Y1V0gL7y2ED0clhfSuCa2XrrC zLfG3/iuf4WmJR9f+SyokdZQfxdpRq+UJ37LOznaaeB1zL3UdD/SqwaW7 k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EAGshOFCtJXG8/2dsb2JhbABFumuBB4IgAQEBBAEBAQ8BCh00FwQCAQgRBAEBCxQJBycLFAkIAgQBEggah2sLmV6gBwSLCIYxYAOkAoFngmM
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,307,1344211200"; d="scan'208";a="115149912"
Received: from rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com ([173.37.113.188]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 25 Aug 2012 00:54:43 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com [173.36.12.88]) by rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7P0shOi023923 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sat, 25 Aug 2012 00:54:43 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.1.246]) by xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com ([173.36.12.88]) with mapi id 14.02.0283.003; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 19:54:43 -0500
From: "Gaurav Halwasia (ghalwasi)" <ghalwasi@cisco.com>
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>, "dhcwg@ietf.org WG" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Call for Adoption: draft-yeh-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-pool-opt-08
Thread-Index: AQHNgg2f2GWemYRp/0G7NT9hbKcz65dptBgg
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 00:54:42 +0000
Message-ID: <90903C21C73202418A48BFBE80AEE5EB0E74A7@xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com>
References: <91484F36-D059-4D90-8BFE-60434864A579@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <91484F36-D059-4D90-8BFE-60434864A579@nominum.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.65.73.100]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19134.004
x-tm-as-result: No--35.566200-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Call for Adoption: draft-yeh-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-pool-opt-08
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 00:54:45 -0000

I support the adoption of this draft.

Thanks,
Gaurav

-----Original Message-----
From: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ted Lemon
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 9:02 PM
To: dhcwg@ietf.org WG
Subject: [dhcwg] Call for Adoption: draft-yeh-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-pool-opt-08

The authors have proposed that the working group adopt the prefix pool option draft as a working group item.   We have engaged in some correspondence with participants in the Routing Area, and while some helpful advice was given, no objections were raised to going forward with the work, and it's a DHCP protocol extension, so it makes sense for it to happen in the DHC working group.

The document proposes an extension to the DHCP protocol that allows the DHCP server to communicate prefixes to the provider edge router when doing prefix delegation, such that this router can advertise a route to an aggregate prefix, rather than to many individual prefixes, and so that this router does not have to perform ad-hoc prefix aggregation, which may produce less optimal results.

If you think this work should be adopted by the working group, please reply to this message saying so.   If you think this work should not be adopted by the working group, please reply to this message saying so.   We will evaluate consensus on September 7.

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg