Re: [dhcwg] Incorporation of WG last call comments in draft-aboba-dhc-domsearch-06.txt

> Main item is that it has a normative reference to
> 
> > [7]  Lemon, T., "Encoding Long DHCP Options", Internet draft (work in
> >      progress), draft-ietf-dhc-concat-01.txt, July 2001.
> 
> so these two document should go together.

Not sure the reference is normative. This option can use the long option
encoding if available, but doesn't require it. 

> 
> Some minor wording nits (these can be dealt with later):
> 
> > the domain search list.  This document defines a new DHCP option which
> > is passed from the DHCP Server to the DHCP Client to specify the domain
> > search list when resolving hostnames.
> 
> Is the option allowed to be included in client messages? I would
> assume so. Indeed, isn't it the case that clients can include any
> option if to signal a desire to the server to get such an option
> returned? If so, I guess this isn't really an issue.

Yes, that's my understanding.

> 
> > In this scheme, an entire domain name or a  list of labels at the end of
> > a domain name is replaced with a pointer to a prior occurrence of the
> 
> s/is replaced/can be replaced/
> 
> > same name.  Despite its complexity, this technique is valuable since the
> 
> Thomas
> 

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg