Re: URI for XML schema and namespace

"tom.petch" <cfinss@dial.pipex.com> Mon, 07 January 2008 16:10 UTC

Message-ID: <021301c8513f$35f1fce0$0601a8c0@pc6>
From: "tom.petch" <cfinss@dial.pipex.com>
To: Chris Newman <Chris.Newman@Sun.COM>
References: <FB2B4EC3-BE66-4192-8657-F318BF9F0329@osafoundation.org><00a601c84edd$2ca4dcc0$0601a8c0@pc6><000001c84ee8$789307a0$0223520a@charger><477E568E.8050307@gmx.de> <000201c84eeb$77c9e3e0$0223520a@charger><104301c84eed$1bbd8500$6502a8c0@china.huawei.com><477E5DA1.9040504@gmx.de><105601c84ef1$90d0d870$6502a8c0@china.huawei.com> <BF4EFF66D86A25114BC4C81A@446E7922C82D299DB29D899F>
Subject: Re: URI for XML schema and namespace
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 12:16:54 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: 'Apps Discuss' <discuss@apps.ietf.org>
Precedence: list
Reply-To: "tom.petch" <cfinss@dial.pipex.com>
Errors-To: discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org

----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Newman" <Chris.Newman@Sun.COM>
To: "David Harrington" <ietfdbh@comcast.net>; "'Julian Reschke'"
<julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: "'Apps Discuss'" <discuss@apps.ietf.org>
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 12:46 AM
Subject: RE: URI for XML schema and namespace


<snip>

>
> To summarize the options:
> 1. URNs for XML namespaces -- present IETF common practice
> 2. non-IETF http URLs for XML namespaces -- acceptable
> 3. iana.org http URLs for XML namespaces -- nobody has tried this, seems
> feasible to me.
> 4. ietf.org http URLs for XML namespaces -- nobody has tried this.  I think
> it's a bad idea.
>
>                 - Chris

The I-D that prompted me to raise this, draft-ietf-forces-model-09.txt, contains

 <xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
       xmlns="http://ietf.org/forces/1.0/lfbmodel"
       xmlns:lfb="http://ietf.org/forces/1.0/lfbmodel"
       targetNamespace="http://ietf.org/forces/1.0/lfbmodel"
       attributeFormDefault="unqualified"
       elementFormDefault="qualified">
      <xsd:annotation>

so ForCES might be trying 4) (and I am trying to persuade them otherwise).

Tom Petch

<snip>

URI for XML schema - why bother? tom.petch
URI for XML schema and namespace tom.petch
RE: URI for XML schema and namespace Scott Hollenbeck
Lisa's Apps Area activity for Dec 2007 Lisa Dusseault
Re: URI for XML schema and namespace Julian Reschke
Re: URI for XML schema and namespace Tim Bray
RE: URI for XML schema and namespace Scott Hollenbeck
Re: URI for XML schema and namespace Julian Reschke
RE: URI for XML schema and namespace David Harrington
Re: URI for XML schema and namespace Peter Saint-Andre
Re: URI for XML schema and namespace Julian Reschke
Re: URI for XML schema and namespace Peter Saint-Andre
Re: URI for XML schema and namespace Julian Reschke
RE: URI for XML schema and namespace David Harrington
Re: URI for XML schema and namespace Julian Reschke
RE: URI for XML schema and namespace Scott Hollenbeck
RE: URI for XML schema and namespace Scott Hollenbeck
RE: URI for XML schema and namespace Scott Hollenbeck
Re: URI for XML schema and namespace Peter Saint-Andre
Re: URI for XML schema and namespace Julian Reschke
Re: URI for XML schema and namespace Tim Bray
RE: URI for XML schema and namespace Chris Newman
Re: URI for XML schema and namespace Tim Bray
RE: URI for XML schema and namespace Martin Duerst
Re: URI for XML schema and namespace Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: URI for XML schema and namespace tom.petch
Re: URI for XML schema and namespace Chris Newman
Re: URI for XML schema and namespace Martin Duerst
Re: URI for XML schema and namespace tom.petch
RE: URI for XML schema - why bother? Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
Re: URI for XML schema - why bother? tom.petch