URI for XML schema and namespace

"tom.petch" <cfinss@dial.pipex.com> Fri, 04 January 2008 15:23 UTC

Return-path: <discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org>
Received: from [] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JAoON-0005iE-KK; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 10:23:27 -0500
Received: from discuss by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JAoOM-0005hz-5D for discuss-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 10:23:26 -0500
Received: from [] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JAoOL-0005hq-RL for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 10:23:25 -0500
Received: from mk-outboundfilter-2.mail.uk.tiscali.com ([]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JAoOK-0005xO-D1 for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 10:23:25 -0500
X-Trace: 6801795/mk-outboundfilter-2.mail.uk.tiscali.com/PIPEX/$MX-ACCEPTED/pipex-infrastructure/
X-SBRS: None
X-IP-MAIL-FROM: cfinss@dial.pipex.com
X-IP-BHB: Once
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao8CAF/efUc+8aIg/2dsb2JhbACrLQ
Received: from ranger.systems.pipex.net ([]) by smtp.pipex.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP; 04 Jan 2008 15:23:22 +0000
Received: from pc6 (1Cust30.tnt7.lnd4.gbr.da.uu.net []) by ranger.systems.pipex.net (Postfix) with SMTP id F2E66E000095 for <discuss@apps.ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Jan 2008 15:23:12 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <00a601c84edd$2ca4dcc0$0601a8c0@pc6>
From: "tom.petch" <cfinss@dial.pipex.com>
To: "Apps Discuss" <discuss@apps.ietf.org>
References: <FB2B4EC3-BE66-4192-8657-F318BF9F0329@osafoundation.org>
Subject: URI for XML schema and namespace
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 14:19:10 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Spam-Score: -100.0 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Scan-Signature: 7bac9cb154eb5790ae3b2913587a40de
X-BeenThere: discuss@apps.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: "tom.petch" <cfinss@dial.pipex.com>
List-Id: general discussion of application-layer protocols <discuss.apps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:discuss@apps.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org

What is the currently recommended form for a URI for an XML schema and an XML

The question has come up on ForCES where I, citing RFC3688 say it should be urn:
whereas the others cite RFC3470 to say that http: is recommended.

Other opinions welcome.

Tom Petch