Re: URI for XML schema and namespace

Chris Newman <Chris.Newman@Sun.COM> Mon, 07 January 2008 17:46 UTC

Return-path: <discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JBw3u-0002o3-RL; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 12:46:58 -0500
Received: from discuss by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JBw3t-0002nm-Hd for discuss-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 12:46:57 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JBw3t-0002nd-7s for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 12:46:57 -0500
Received: from brmea-mail-3.sun.com ([192.18.98.34]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JBw3r-0003vY-Fo for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 12:46:57 -0500
Received: from fe-amer-09.sun.com ([192.18.109.79]) by brmea-mail-3.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m07HksA5028144 for <discuss@apps.ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Jan 2008 17:46:55 GMT
Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-amer.sun.com by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0JUA00901BRGZS00@mail-amer.sun.com> (original mail from Chris.Newman@Sun.COM) for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 10:46:54 -0700 (MST)
Received: from [10.1.110.5] (24-205-138-209.dhcp.psdn.ca.charter.com [24.205.138.209]) by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0JUA008QHC1W2Z50@mail-amer.sun.com>; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 10:46:46 -0700 (MST)
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 09:46:51 -0800
From: Chris Newman <Chris.Newman@Sun.COM>
Subject: Re: URI for XML schema and namespace
In-reply-to: <20080107092509.GA15174@nic.fr>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
Message-id: <BB3E0D328E104EAA32719EB5@446E7922C82D299DB29D899F>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X)
Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-disposition: inline
References: <FB2B4EC3-BE66-4192-8657-F318BF9F0329@osafoundation.org> <00a601c84edd$2ca4dcc0$0601a8c0@pc6> <000001c84ee8$789307a0$0223520a@charger> <477E568E.8050307@gmx.de> <000201c84eeb$77c9e3e0$0223520a@charger> <104301c84eed$1bbd8500$6502a8c0@china.huawei.com> <477E5DA1.9040504@gmx.de> <105601c84ef1$90d0d870$6502a8c0@china.huawei.com> <BF4EFF66D86A25114BC4C81A@446E7922C82D299DB29D899F> <20080107092509.GA15174@nic.fr>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
X-Scan-Signature: 08170828343bcf1325e4a0fb4584481c
Cc: 'Apps Discuss' <discuss@apps.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: discuss@apps.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: general discussion of application-layer protocols <discuss.apps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:discuss@apps.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org

Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote on 1/7/08 10:25 +0100:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 03:46:02PM -0800,
>  Chris Newman <Chris.Newman@Sun.COM> wrote
>  a message of 90 lines which said:
>
>> To summarize the options:
>
> 5. Eat our own dog food and use RFC 4151?

As RFC 4151 is informational, it's debatable whose dog food it is.  But it 
appears to be another option.  For this purpose it would seem to have the same 
issues that URNs have.

                - Chris