Re: URI for XML schema and namespace

Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> Tue, 08 January 2008 04:48 UTC

Return-path: <discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JC6OI-00024z-2P; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 23:48:42 -0500
Received: from discuss by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JC6OG-00024K-Cr for discuss-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 23:48:40 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JC6OG-00024C-3C for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 23:48:40 -0500
Received: from scmailgw2.scop.aoyama.ac.jp ([133.2.251.195]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JC6OD-0007ny-Jh for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 23:48:40 -0500
Received: from scmse1.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (scmse1 [133.2.253.16]) by scmailgw2.scop.aoyama.ac.jp (secret/secret) with SMTP id m084mYiC026322 for <discuss@apps.ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Jan 2008 13:48:34 +0900 (JST)
Received: from (133.2.206.133) by scmse1.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp via smtp id 4260_f7cf5b88_bda4_11dc_9d4f_0014221fa3c9; Tue, 08 Jan 2008 13:48:34 +0900
Received: from Tanzawa.it.aoyama.ac.jp ([133.2.210.1]:55408) by itmail.it.aoyama.ac.jp with [XMail 1.22 ESMTP Server] id <S2E819B> for <discuss@apps.ietf.org> from <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>; Tue, 8 Jan 2008 13:44:25 +0900
Message-Id: <6.0.0.20.2.20080108104826.09b13570@localhost>
X-Sender: duerst@localhost
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6J
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 10:49:43 +0900
To: "tom.petch" <cfinss@dial.pipex.com>, "Chris Newman" <Chris.Newman@Sun.COM>
From: Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Subject: Re: URI for XML schema and namespace
In-Reply-To: <021301c8513f$35f1fce0$0601a8c0@pc6>
References: <FB2B4EC3-BE66-4192-8657-F318BF9F0329@osafoundation.org> <00a601c84edd$2ca4dcc0$0601a8c0@pc6> <000001c84ee8$789307a0$0223520a@charger> <477E568E.8050307@gmx.de> <000201c84eeb$77c9e3e0$0223520a@charger> <104301c84eed$1bbd8500$6502a8c0@china.huawei.com> <477E5DA1.9040504@gmx.de> <105601c84ef1$90d0d870$6502a8c0@china.huawei.com> <BF4EFF66D86A25114BC4C81A@446E7922C82D299DB29D899F> <021301c8513f$35f1fce0$0601a8c0@pc6>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+)
X-Scan-Signature: 8b431ad66d60be2d47c7bfeb879db82c
Cc: 'Apps Discuss' <discuss@apps.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: discuss@apps.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: general discussion of application-layer protocols <discuss.apps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:discuss@apps.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org

Hello Tom,

Are they using things such as http://ietf.org/forces/1.0/lfbmodel
as resolvable URIs or are they using them without planning to
have them resolvable?

Regards,    Martin.

At 20:16 08/01/07, tom.petch wrote:
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Chris Newman" <Chris.Newman@Sun.COM>
>To: "David Harrington" <ietfdbh@comcast.net>et>; "'Julian Reschke'"
><julian.reschke@gmx.de>
>Cc: "'Apps Discuss'" <discuss@apps.ietf.org>
>Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 12:46 AM
>Subject: RE: URI for XML schema and namespace
>
>
><snip>
>
>>
>> To summarize the options:
>> 1. URNs for XML namespaces -- present IETF common practice
>> 2. non-IETF http URLs for XML namespaces -- acceptable
>> 3. iana.org http URLs for XML namespaces -- nobody has tried this, seems
>> feasible to me.
>> 4. ietf.org http URLs for XML namespaces -- nobody has tried this.  I think
>> it's a bad idea.
>>
>>                 - Chris
>
>The I-D that prompted me to raise this, draft-ietf-forces-model-09.txt, contains
>
> <xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
>       xmlns="http://ietf.org/forces/1.0/lfbmodel"
>       xmlns:lfb="http://ietf.org/forces/1.0/lfbmodel"
>       targetNamespace="http://ietf.org/forces/1.0/lfbmodel"
>       attributeFormDefault="unqualified"
>       elementFormDefault="qualified">
>      <xsd:annotation>
>
>so ForCES might be trying 4) (and I am trying to persuade them otherwise).
>
>Tom Petch
>
><snip>


#-#-#  Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-#-#  http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp       mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp