RE: URI for XML schema and namespace

"David Harrington" <ietfdbh@comcast.net> Fri, 04 January 2008 16:48 UTC

From: David Harrington <ietfdbh@comcast.net>
To: 'Julian Reschke' <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
References: <FB2B4EC3-BE66-4192-8657-F318BF9F0329@osafoundation.org> <00a601c84edd$2ca4dcc0$0601a8c0@pc6><000001c84ee8$789307a0$0223520a@charger> <477E568E.8050307@gmx.de> <000201c84eeb$77c9e3e0$0223520a@charger> <104301c84eed$1bbd8500$6502a8c0@china.huawei.com> <477E5DA1.9040504@gmx.de>
Subject: RE: URI for XML schema and namespace
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 11:47:59 -0500
Message-ID: <105601c84ef1$90d0d870$6502a8c0@china.huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <477E5DA1.9040504@gmx.de>
Thread-Index: AchO7kI0OJfitIttRLG4hU9THeBaPwAAOzBw
Cc: 'Apps Discuss' <discuss@apps.ietf.org>
Precedence: list
Errors-To: discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org

Hi Julian,

That's an interesting observation, but it didn't answer my question.
Has anybody explicitly asked the people who can create such a
permanent web site to do so?
Has anybody fashioned an explicit proposal for the establishment of
permanent IETF URIs?

Am I off-target with my question?
Would this simply be a bad idea?
If it is a good idea, who wants it badly enough to write such a
proposal?

David Harrington
dbharrington@comcast.net
ietfdbh@comcast.net

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de] 
> Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 11:24 AM
> To: David Harrington
> Cc: 'Scott Hollenbeck'; 'Apps Discuss'
> Subject: Re: URI for XML schema and namespace
> 
> David Harrington wrote:
> > Has anybody actually asked Ray to get such a  permanent 
> part of IETF's
> > own web space allocated and setup? Would entries on the web site
> > require IANA assignment, e.g. as a registry?
> > 
> > I'm asking because I am new to the discussion, and simply don't
know
> > the answer.
> > 
> > dbh
> 
> I think historically there's a lot of reluctance inside IANA (or the

> whole IESG) to consider any URI starting with "http" as permanent.
> 
> BR, Julian
>

URI for XML schema - why bother? tom.petch
URI for XML schema and namespace tom.petch
RE: URI for XML schema and namespace Scott Hollenbeck
Lisa's Apps Area activity for Dec 2007 Lisa Dusseault
Re: URI for XML schema and namespace Julian Reschke
Re: URI for XML schema and namespace Tim Bray
RE: URI for XML schema and namespace Scott Hollenbeck
Re: URI for XML schema and namespace Julian Reschke
RE: URI for XML schema and namespace David Harrington
Re: URI for XML schema and namespace Peter Saint-Andre
Re: URI for XML schema and namespace Julian Reschke
Re: URI for XML schema and namespace Peter Saint-Andre
Re: URI for XML schema and namespace Julian Reschke
RE: URI for XML schema and namespace David Harrington
Re: URI for XML schema and namespace Julian Reschke
RE: URI for XML schema and namespace Scott Hollenbeck
RE: URI for XML schema and namespace Scott Hollenbeck
RE: URI for XML schema and namespace Scott Hollenbeck
Re: URI for XML schema and namespace Peter Saint-Andre
Re: URI for XML schema and namespace Julian Reschke
Re: URI for XML schema and namespace Tim Bray
RE: URI for XML schema and namespace Chris Newman
Re: URI for XML schema and namespace Tim Bray
RE: URI for XML schema and namespace Martin Duerst
Re: URI for XML schema and namespace Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: URI for XML schema and namespace tom.petch
Re: URI for XML schema and namespace Chris Newman
Re: URI for XML schema and namespace Martin Duerst
Re: URI for XML schema and namespace tom.petch
RE: URI for XML schema - why bother? Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
Re: URI for XML schema - why bother? tom.petch