Re: URI for XML schema and namespace

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Fri, 04 January 2008 16:25 UTC

Return-path: <discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JApMY-0001Ci-9J; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 11:25:38 -0500
Received: from discuss by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JApMX-0001Cb-85 for discuss-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 11:25:37 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JApMW-0001CT-Ub for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 11:25:36 -0500
Received: from dizzyd.com ([207.210.219.225]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JApMV-0007FZ-Ii for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 11:25:36 -0500
Received: from wrk225.corp.jabber.com (dencfw1.jabber.com [207.182.164.5]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by dizzyd.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B16AC404A1; Fri, 4 Jan 2008 09:25:34 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <477E5DFD.10302@stpeter.im>
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 09:25:33 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: URI for XML schema and namespace
References: <FB2B4EC3-BE66-4192-8657-F318BF9F0329@osafoundation.org> <00a601c84edd$2ca4dcc0$0601a8c0@pc6><000001c84ee8$789307a0$0223520a@charger> <477E568E.8050307@gmx.de> <000201c84eeb$77c9e3e0$0223520a@charger> <104301c84eed$1bbd8500$6502a8c0@china.huawei.com> <477E5DA1.9040504@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <477E5DA1.9040504@gmx.de>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms000905080809020102020408"
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: ee80a2074afbfe28d15369f4e74e579d
Cc: 'Apps Discuss' <discuss@apps.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: discuss@apps.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: general discussion of application-layer protocols <discuss.apps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:discuss@apps.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org

Julian Reschke wrote:
> David Harrington wrote:
>> Has anybody actually asked Ray to get such a  permanent part of IETF's
>> own web space allocated and setup? Would entries on the web site
>> require IANA assignment, e.g. as a registry?
>>
>> I'm asking because I am new to the discussion, and simply don't know
>> the answer.
>>
>> dbh
> 
> I think historically there's a lot of reluctance inside IANA (or the 
> whole IESG) to consider any URI starting with "http" as permanent.

Besides, URNs are relatively easy to obtain, so why not use them?

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/