Lisa's Apps Area activity for Dec 2007
Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org> Tue, 01 January 2008 21:11 UTC
Return-path: <discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J9oOW-0005yc-6r; Tue, 01 Jan 2008 16:11:28 -0500
Received: from discuss by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1J9oOU-0005pE-57 for discuss-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 01 Jan 2008 16:11:26 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J9oOT-0005ns-RJ for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Tue, 01 Jan 2008 16:11:25 -0500
Received: from laweleka.osafoundation.org ([204.152.186.98]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J9oOT-0006iw-1b for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Tue, 01 Jan 2008 16:11:25 -0500
Received: from localhost (laweleka.osafoundation.org [127.0.0.1]) by laweleka.osafoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAEBC142254; Tue, 1 Jan 2008 13:11:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new and clamav at osafoundation.org
Received: from laweleka.osafoundation.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (laweleka.osafoundation.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4B05khDts-85; Tue, 1 Jan 2008 13:11:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.101] (unknown [74.95.2.169]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by laweleka.osafoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21E9F142245; Tue, 1 Jan 2008 13:11:21 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
Message-Id: <FB2B4EC3-BE66-4192-8657-F318BF9F0329@osafoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-3--276137684"
To: Apps Discuss <discuss@apps.ietf.org>, Lisa Dusseault's Chairs <lisa-dusseault-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Lisa's Apps Area activity for Dec 2007
From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2008 13:11:17 -0800
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3)
X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----)
X-Scan-Signature: 2ed806e2f53ff1a061ad4f97e00345ac
Cc:
X-BeenThere: discuss@apps.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: general discussion of application-layer protocols <discuss.apps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:discuss@apps.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org
Notes Brief report due to not much activity over holidays Document Status and Progress Active Documents: my action - draft-ellermann-news-nntp-uri (Proposed Standard): I need to review - draft-wilde-sms-uri (Proposed Standard): I need to do a writeup -- no doc shepherd. Major issue to deal with: overlap with tel URI. Stalled, in review, waiting on other: - draft-ietf-sieve-body (Proposed Standard): On agenda 1/10 for IESG Evaluation - draft-adolf-dvb-urn (Informational): same - draft-evain-ebu-urn (Informational): Need new text or version to address secdir review - draft-klensin-rfc2821bis (Draft Standard): IETF Last Call is over, author and shepherd are taking some time before deciding how to address last call issues. - draft-ietf-sieve-notify: Doc shepherd is dealing with DISCUSS issues - draft-ietf-sieve-notify-xmpp: same - draft-creed-ogc-urn (Informational): Waiting for new version to deal with IESG eval input. - draft-ietf-sieve-notify-mailto: waiting on new version after IETF last call - draft-snell-atompub-bidi (Proposed Standard): author waiting on some implementation feedback - draft-ietf-imapext-sort (Proposed Standard) : waiting for authors to revise or decide it's ready Finished Processing -- RFC Ed queue and new RFCs - draft-goodwin-iso-urn (Informational): Approved, waiting until post-holiday processing to enter RFC queue - draft-sjdcox-cgi-urn (Informational): same - draft-mealling-epc-urn (Informational) - draft-saintandre-rfc4622bis (Proposed Standard) - draft-crocker-rfc4234bis (Standard) - draft-ietf-sieve-3028bis (Proposed Standard) WG Status - not much action other than SIEVE, CALSIFY and HTTP meetings at IETF71.
- URI for XML schema - why bother? tom.petch
- URI for XML schema and namespace tom.petch
- RE: URI for XML schema and namespace Scott Hollenbeck
- Lisa's Apps Area activity for Dec 2007 Lisa Dusseault
- Re: URI for XML schema and namespace Julian Reschke
- Re: URI for XML schema and namespace Tim Bray
- RE: URI for XML schema and namespace Scott Hollenbeck
- Re: URI for XML schema and namespace Julian Reschke
- RE: URI for XML schema and namespace David Harrington
- Re: URI for XML schema and namespace Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: URI for XML schema and namespace Julian Reschke
- Re: URI for XML schema and namespace Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: URI for XML schema and namespace Julian Reschke
- RE: URI for XML schema and namespace David Harrington
- Re: URI for XML schema and namespace Julian Reschke
- RE: URI for XML schema and namespace Scott Hollenbeck
- RE: URI for XML schema and namespace Scott Hollenbeck
- RE: URI for XML schema and namespace Scott Hollenbeck
- Re: URI for XML schema and namespace Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: URI for XML schema and namespace Julian Reschke
- Re: URI for XML schema and namespace Tim Bray
- RE: URI for XML schema and namespace Chris Newman
- Re: URI for XML schema and namespace Tim Bray
- RE: URI for XML schema and namespace Martin Duerst
- Re: URI for XML schema and namespace Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: URI for XML schema and namespace tom.petch
- Re: URI for XML schema and namespace Chris Newman
- Re: URI for XML schema and namespace Martin Duerst
- Re: URI for XML schema and namespace tom.petch
- RE: URI for XML schema - why bother? Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: URI for XML schema - why bother? tom.petch