Re: URI for XML schema and namespace

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Fri, 04 January 2008 19:07 UTC

Return-path: <discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JArsi-0002dc-5T; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 14:07:00 -0500
Received: from discuss by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JArsg-0002dX-SV for discuss-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 14:06:58 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JArsg-0002dP-IT for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 14:06:58 -0500
Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JArse-0001hf-Qr for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 14:06:58 -0500
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 04 Jan 2008 19:06:55 -0000
Received: from p508FA0A9.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [192.168.178.22]) [80.143.160.169] by mail.gmx.net (mp010) with SMTP; 04 Jan 2008 20:06:55 +0100
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19WIBRiOl1W+FrfaMv6MFHkzxfqMnhsVajJ/NxORa trxEETrn2EdDEA
Message-ID: <477E83CD.8040400@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 20:06:53 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.8.0.4) Gecko/20060516 Thunderbird/1.5.0.4 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
Subject: Re: URI for XML schema and namespace
References: <FB2B4EC3-BE66-4192-8657-F318BF9F0329@osafoundation.org> <00a601c84edd$2ca4dcc0$0601a8c0@pc6><000001c84ee8$789307a0$0223520a@charger> <477E568E.8050307@gmx.de><000201c84eeb$77c9e3e0$0223520a@charger> <104301c84eed$1bbd8500$6502a8c0@china.huawei.com><477E5DA1.9040504@gmx.de> <477E5DFD.10302@stpeter.im> <477E609E.6010402@gmx.de> <001f01c84ef8$f7142e50$0223520a@charger> <477E7EC3.4090408@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <477E7EC3.4090408@stpeter.im>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 1ac7cc0a4cd376402b85bc1961a86ac2
Cc: 'Apps Discuss' <discuss@apps.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: discuss@apps.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: general discussion of application-layer protocols <discuss.apps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:discuss@apps.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org

Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> Right.
> 
> In my experience, developers want to resolve namespaces when they're 
> trying to figure out what the namespace means, what the schema is, etc. 
> But applications don't need to resolve namespaces, nor do end users. At 
> least as a general rule...
> 
> Peter

Of course. It's sad that this need to be pointed out from time to time :-)

BR, Julian