Re: [dispatch] I-D Action: draft-pd-dispatch-msrp-websocket-03.txt

[Sergio Garcia Murillo <[e-mail]>]

El 13/02/2014 22:24, Peter Dunkley escribió:
> Hello,
>
> Because WebSockets is an asynchronous protocol two MSRP peers (that 
> are clients) cannot use MSRP over WebSockets.
>
> It could be possible for a WebSocket server to be an MSRP peer (for 
> example, in the scenario where the server is B2B'ing MSRP like an SBC 
> will do in IMS for CEMA).  Christer Holmberg has expressed an interest 
> in this scenario and may provide language relating to it for the draft 
> - but for now this is out of the scope of the draft which explicitly 
> deals just with with the MSRP through relay scenario.  If Christer 
> does provide some additional language then the draft will cover this 
> without relay scenario, but if not nothing in the draft should prevent 
> someone from addressing it in the future with an additional document 
> (should there be interest).
>
> From my point-of-view I am only interested in the with relay scenario 
> at this time.

Fair enough, but then maybe the draft should be named "MSRP over 
webscokets via MSRP relay" to avoid confusions .. ;)

In that case, using the TCP/WS/MSRP wouldn't be correct in my point of 
view and the draft is ok as it is. I was thinking more in the scenario 
of the MSRP peer also been the Websocket server, that is very similar to 
the scenario we have in BFCP over websockets.

Best regards
Sergio