IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] auth-res vs. dmarc

Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> Wed, 30 December 2020 14:01 UTC

Return-Path: <mike@fresheez.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 991093A0AD6 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 06:01:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mtcc.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5g5LOg7oSK5X for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 06:01:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pl1-x632.google.com (mail-pl1-x632.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::632]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FB863A0ACC for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 06:01:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pl1-x632.google.com with SMTP id t6so8720706plq.1 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 06:01:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mtcc.com; s=fluffulence; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language; bh=TfWjyD9x/aPrsiy7z1n6CjyJtj2MNtE0y1XYvkyFVqA=; b=kZGCFPi4yyD5olWKsOvOMnLWIuU3dC6WTeN/EDmkzNrmQ+r2tjrZ2OQVemw2BG02iU bqEfkeXdZedA9UOjpjVYB2eIlUEc+ktGjVKpQj66s8nKEJ6MWKRMfdIeOCGic0yc7Ie5 QQ/KvYVpFBjzb5+qJb6THSErOYHAOnPTGQ81F69P7j/G47WTHFXYkdrWpXEK3/JPLvvX qIYjcO+nJbEVo0g1GOGVQVwG8/lhMy6NiI2jqJ7MMaGH4SCjE0v7FPRf1yDUYuwCxZRA s5XJ9nmp7mDUZE/Msl6pMiH04M07/1AVQWuBavZqbW7CbIUAUYbZhky6wTdqM9vG4XRW 7Eow==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=TfWjyD9x/aPrsiy7z1n6CjyJtj2MNtE0y1XYvkyFVqA=; b=NI/Sc2zBEXqN0nKyA4WDX6J0br/HruB60LWSEJL8CpBQmpxRaG1YbrGMOJ2IVVV4AY 3ujro2Ara1PQ3s7BnLtDn/n8z/9MCz//5a/+6nauq2/3UBHBbgunm8cJFv0uub1FvTNS axlQbhEu7vms1KbcAgIG76hl2Bl6aWmgukoZ6omcdpeBQV3dDeTvfNsRUslpIj++AOFg /fe92abYkeW9P6Y/pKzkeJ3UCuIR1mnA30fv9ePSyIh88u7Sjj8I71lTLh12XeDqLnAk oArGJPr3lz2PS/u0tjGN+RJ2LHJAuy4PrhZi1eLP8Pkrp/Sivy9UDxxzI48IQz0nzpUs l4vg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531NR35G8N65qca8FoiX04f+/AgqLWjfnY0/xSS4SsZdIS8dyM1H bSE4X/uEcBVfUyDJjbTQWoDNA3LdBq0uxw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwSSM8RFDJgxkcpwGtwgNGkfXeU+15bctxGVjHMYQZtEIWJaLEqq/I4elNIJVknPz1QoBPTzw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:bcc6:b029:db:e257:9050 with SMTP id o6-20020a170902bcc6b02900dbe2579050mr31520380pls.22.1609336896313; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 06:01:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mike-mac.lan (107-182-45-95.volcanocom.com. [107.182.45.95]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j8sm7131749pji.1.2020.12.30.06.01.34 for <dmarc@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 30 Dec 2020 06:01:35 -0800 (PST)
To: dmarc@ietf.org
References: <9f6782b1-e85b-1a9c-9151-98feff7e18ea@mtcc.com> <CAHej_8m0OWsTt+tcSgUh+Fxu=HH_57nsb2O1Q_fgA2453ceh4g@mail.gmail.com> <140485eb-020f-4406-3f2f-e2c475ea51e5@mtcc.com> <CAHej_8mApfoF2ORgL+DoYTanrdhMjvT9H27kORwLKCQc1C9sRw@mail.gmail.com> <5588dbbe-b876-ed80-c80f-792380e3718f@mtcc.com> <CAHej_8=kW_t_JkOxUud1Uz8+PrbMh5CfwfxZK=mhe0wjW8wQpw@mail.gmail.com> <54dd9978-bcd1-6757-ad27-dcef6db6e5f7@mtcc.com> <CAHej_8kCi=7oqojDH_rbjn7kRg-PTDJWLgcKTGK9z-baUnKeMw@mail.gmail.com> <ef32de1e-d47e-1d0f-3cec-5994c7fdb7ae@mtcc.com> <CAHej_8kjSsQK_XEbdjWzV5npa29YjGadzD06Fmx3QLB4p+n_Cg@mail.gmail.com> <937f1019-a028-308d-2a0f-1e720fd49dcd@mtcc.com> <d8014c2a-c1c9-9eac-e64a-5f285bab7fd3@tana.it> <CAHej_8mgYr9ERAxmup+keZT5u8L+qgCxcSLH7Z=BEuZLouttpg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
Message-ID: <72e20c17-e991-e82a-9120-a27097e3ac58@mtcc.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 06:01:34 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAHej_8mgYr9ERAxmup+keZT5u8L+qgCxcSLH7Z=BEuZLouttpg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------827133265C3AE28F4F96EA5F"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/37_CW3v0MM1MDZe503FXJur4v1I>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] auth-res vs. dmarc
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 14:01:39 -0000

On 12/30/20 5:48 AM, Todd Herr wrote:
>
>     I propose to add two new result name codes, named after the policy
>     requests:
>
>         dmarc=quarantine, and
>
>         dmarc=reject (of course, you only see this if the filter
>     didn't honor the request).
>
>
> I do not support this, because quarantine, reject, and none are not 
> Authentication Results, but are instead both policy requests and 
> disposition decisions.
>
Then we should remove DMARC from auth-res altogether because it is not 
an authentication mechanism. Either we fully support DMARC in auth-res 
or remove it. This half-assed state of unlessness serves nobody.

Mike

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email