IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] auth-res vs. dmarc

Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> Wed, 30 December 2020 18:02 UTC

Return-Path: <mike@fresheez.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 341AF3A0B18 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 10:02:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mtcc.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bPZwuRZZfOUz for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 10:02:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52c.google.com (mail-pg1-x52c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A9BB3A0B16 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 10:02:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52c.google.com with SMTP id i7so11743275pgc.8 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 10:02:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mtcc.com; s=fluffulence; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=eVfwUTphqsOBCRiQ6E+JAtxwg7ZGB439KeQ3lpCIyZ4=; b=fdnJW8I+xjfiDKUXdYJRRxoV9lwDKOz5hvmN85VIclaaEzGqyFZER5Amh4efxcThpu FKOOa27dUxH4OFVhQ4JVNIyg05vVw3Hl/v2eSBkCTbGUOw+8vf/KVDzAAgo482HUUskk iAmNJS2iFve3KzWgG6J3vcGIvWptCwK0GPYPYXl0ODiH1CxzrZJYmqWPS5Z8vN7eX+yA iOLy28PethyvDgoFlLQFfbxmNBU596sokA8qiyseIYeAQi04Xd+4n1o/+1/VIqVnGX0+ Wuyg68FQegoLPlH18vl1pg75FcZbmXCGGjGYzfOOdcQrp/1wxMrgEeTKQqQPXfvYPYAt xxZQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=eVfwUTphqsOBCRiQ6E+JAtxwg7ZGB439KeQ3lpCIyZ4=; b=sEWe+3i+sQQJycIwDskzvuOK0RPvxIzn+hdrjev0834yvXtdxNxW35rYdNmp93C/Uj o4gcA8CSnNW+/PPlf41rxNrVN31iCscDJpwtcyFsHOAJGOruCLKGW/XGAVzkYGQUfKEz On6/aioy8m2nMhnrQjvIrDE7/TKMaBfx2/4EAfvc2X0d34rFbu+GBRjZ/8Ohim+JR/v0 RYhBINo9G1ZwAyMefsDMJOQJP6DFoOckZo7oCL5ZNqYhz0WQKlTs3/w38zPik3MqiGFi VO6Z2N+mo3vRuDUvc/xlhHemrRoIceRVlm/JBzQEpQdM0pldXTahLYfFPWQX+N0mTkjw bIOA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533hPNX2a8dECnwpS2Kh/lFbO/Q2eHhd5qnSPB0cKyDfDBMcBtkO YeaXzMO8GijPzV/2KaM3JHwwX3zd+2if2Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz/9pe2wTDCXZHzJwUqSpUbrNtE9P1qp9MhloeCnlBG3ilVBffyE/emSmeTWQsXNo0sRAkQpw==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:ea4b:: with SMTP id l11mr52626494pgk.61.1609351372070; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 10:02:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mike-mac.lan (107-182-45-95.volcanocom.com. [107.182.45.95]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b12sm13484654pgr.9.2020.12.30.10.02.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 30 Dec 2020 10:02:51 -0800 (PST)
To: Seth Blank <seth@valimail.com>
Cc: Dotzero <dotzero@gmail.com>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
References: <9f6782b1-e85b-1a9c-9151-98feff7e18ea@mtcc.com> <CAHej_8=kW_t_JkOxUud1Uz8+PrbMh5CfwfxZK=mhe0wjW8wQpw@mail.gmail.com> <54dd9978-bcd1-6757-ad27-dcef6db6e5f7@mtcc.com> <CAHej_8kCi=7oqojDH_rbjn7kRg-PTDJWLgcKTGK9z-baUnKeMw@mail.gmail.com> <ef32de1e-d47e-1d0f-3cec-5994c7fdb7ae@mtcc.com> <CAHej_8kjSsQK_XEbdjWzV5npa29YjGadzD06Fmx3QLB4p+n_Cg@mail.gmail.com> <937f1019-a028-308d-2a0f-1e720fd49dcd@mtcc.com> <d8014c2a-c1c9-9eac-e64a-5f285bab7fd3@tana.it> <CAHej_8mgYr9ERAxmup+keZT5u8L+qgCxcSLH7Z=BEuZLouttpg@mail.gmail.com> <72e20c17-e991-e82a-9120-a27097e3ac58@mtcc.com> <CAHej_8=6huc-N4ymDTOWZXHGjQQ-3RFDdomRzmGp4kOseHckMQ@mail.gmail.com> <7863d250-f56a-1fe1-44ee-fbc7486d48b4@mtcc.com> <CAJ4XoYdMdaE92UOrXvcAqm2iou+PCGg_uzHUsmBsYRe1PivBJw@mail.gmail.com> <ac7b7b32-c544-60f2-1a6a-a5a210ac72ed@mtcc.com> <CAOZAAfNRgxJaO-TJcnvqJTqOCsixzLJVK+vSH-Av+FezY=texw@mail.gmail.com> <0b0c0c7c-f374-6718-5071-b5e9b0d67db3@mtcc.com> <CAOZAAfMnF_3bLHObrCRqoPG_GNuFaxbAc1m-arxmXFBn_3EX6Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
Message-ID: <55cbdb92-0e7b-d334-1e26-463452ea476c@mtcc.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 10:02:49 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAOZAAfMnF_3bLHObrCRqoPG_GNuFaxbAc1m-arxmXFBn_3EX6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/5l-vZhIvG2hUT7VNjIPNThlaOgQ>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] auth-res vs. dmarc
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 18:02:54 -0000

On 12/30/20 9:20 AM, Seth Blank wrote:
> Please follow the process stated by the chairs, open the tickets, and 
> we’ll tear through the items. It’s disruptive threads that take us off 
> task and make it feel like “five years” worth of tickets. Most in the 
> tracker are simple and close to NOOPs if we stay focused.
>
Filed. And I still have no  idea what tickets we're actually supposed to 
be talking about. And since when did IETF process require tickets to be 
opened to discuss issues?

Mike

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email