IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] auth-res vs. dmarc

Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> Wed, 30 December 2020 18:13 UTC

Return-Path: <vesely@tana.it>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3355B3A0A3E for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 10:13:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1152-bit key) header.d=tana.it
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XoKFtvDN8y6n for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 10:13:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wmail.tana.it (wmail.tana.it [62.94.243.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5E5F3A0062 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 10:13:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=delta; t=1609352001; bh=SOT/EjUlyJJwcUsDskySlVEKPNcXZfRUDgMTVuys/E8=; l=329; h=To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=BWWjuF0yehNUvxcuj1tcV5xI857BbWYB/D9FheqgnJBXk0ySfBWTnyPETOVJuYn4q shyN8ip42p0QSlOH+fCDEvggz/3845H2fqI/rl5VM5Ml7evhOafsCRYgpMrq/xkPMo DbVYmc/ZiTh0qROXloh5AEQ6jSbJ9yktfIBLR59yxlpClhA5JwmU0KuA4tfAO
Authentication-Results: tana.it; auth=pass (details omitted)
Original-From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Received: from [172.25.197.111] (pcale.tana [172.25.197.111]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 uXDGrn@SYT0/k, TLS: TLS1.3, 128bits, ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) by wmail.tana.it with ESMTPSA id 00000000005DC056.000000005FECC341.00005D92; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 19:13:21 +0100
To: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
References: <9f6782b1-e85b-1a9c-9151-98feff7e18ea@mtcc.com> <CAHej_8mApfoF2ORgL+DoYTanrdhMjvT9H27kORwLKCQc1C9sRw@mail.gmail.com> <5588dbbe-b876-ed80-c80f-792380e3718f@mtcc.com> <CAHej_8=kW_t_JkOxUud1Uz8+PrbMh5CfwfxZK=mhe0wjW8wQpw@mail.gmail.com> <54dd9978-bcd1-6757-ad27-dcef6db6e5f7@mtcc.com> <CAHej_8kCi=7oqojDH_rbjn7kRg-PTDJWLgcKTGK9z-baUnKeMw@mail.gmail.com> <ef32de1e-d47e-1d0f-3cec-5994c7fdb7ae@mtcc.com> <CAHej_8kjSsQK_XEbdjWzV5npa29YjGadzD06Fmx3QLB4p+n_Cg@mail.gmail.com> <937f1019-a028-308d-2a0f-1e720fd49dcd@mtcc.com> <d8014c2a-c1c9-9eac-e64a-5f285bab7fd3@tana.it> <CAHej_8mgYr9ERAxmup+keZT5u8L+qgCxcSLH7Z=BEuZLouttpg@mail.gmail.com> <72e20c17-e991-e82a-9120-a27097e3ac58@mtcc.com> <CAHej_8=6huc-N4ymDTOWZXHGjQQ-3RFDdomRzmGp4kOseHckMQ@mail.gmail.com> <7863d250-f56a-1fe1-44ee-fbc7486d48b4@mtcc.com> <CAJ4XoYdMdaE92UOrXvcAqm2iou+PCGg_uzHUsmBsYRe1PivBJw@mail.gmail.com> <502c2363-385c-b90c-a22a-716594967190@mtcc.com> <CAJ4XoYdP1bedYv+3MK3vrirfr5CTGvpiOxSO-zZ=9q7=Up9p0g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Message-ID: <01fe63df-1960-868a-3351-08a24bb7a9cf@tana.it>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 19:13:21 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAJ4XoYdP1bedYv+3MK3vrirfr5CTGvpiOxSO-zZ=9q7=Up9p0g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/mnbv4KvUkc-SnhtNNq5O0I6gNRU>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] auth-res vs. dmarc
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 18:13:25 -0000

On Wed 30/Dec/2020 17:38:29 +0100 Dotzero wrote:
> And for the second time, that is not a DMARC problem, it is an auth-res problem.


Standardizing the result names for dmarc authentication method is an integral 
part of DMARC specification.

Added ticket 91
https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/ticket/91


Best
Ale
--

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email