Re: [dmarc-ietf] auth-res vs. dmarc

Todd Herr <todd.herr@valimail.com> Wed, 30 December 2020 15:40 UTC

Return-Path: <todd.herr@valimail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9F993A07C8 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 07:40:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=valimail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yp-YOXCf7wYm for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 07:40:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf2d.google.com (mail-qv1-xf2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC4C43A048B for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 07:40:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf2d.google.com with SMTP id l7so7842468qvt.4 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 07:40:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=valimail.com; s=google2048; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=7kvEWmdCi25ELMbL81M+HEyWCDaEiXMqNYKSuFfP97o=; b=OUc8qR3vOP2Vp2TMhfmZe1hcIdbM5eQBcm8whg70QkYfga8Het8Ojdh4H34F+T1dXz F9KyEE8t0Hk6yFaBfHtbaD8519ndKOu0MtTCafgbpVO1MF4cadGU66ZrYc9sqoT0qThs fE4yDsT/j6zmVFUyiYsftRG9mGGolYyd2fYF34VGJIywXcUxfMxPW8P9pZKwf7a9L564 2gt/mJK3e/T+mNlj1Ys6GRjHOSYEglLGCO0bkPY1jRvyoRdr+8PwTF1jSFx0zSJNWQv0 3civDHMzXoIQXVloEOcFyqMNpzH/KkyUSAA6Si5SE06OwuimvoUskwWDxVFANh2zqtbN m4qw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=7kvEWmdCi25ELMbL81M+HEyWCDaEiXMqNYKSuFfP97o=; b=an64J8bRV7j5PHSuUZOLTLafdGcuAS3bfz0uwS2xyUJ8RQ3fu8dCr7HiBbUydmIEZR leLefiOLnez7L3nc684bv3n7f0RLxwQ9ZKT/TMj78BDgokOdP9lMkS4tqTPw/rVe7JJX zbYa/PRkn9gMau4WRonU21yZloSDZPHNSWhdKPAxeCBIurgdjLNZKQuWiE/+05Eh6TEe OEb63pv5skYEgVIglhqb5gJXWgkFIuu3RPdVZb5LJQRip1KiW2u6K9iF+5zTR7j6Qywt p7sQ5GgE8+U5FAo4xqJE0XvMFm8xST7m8UgEYdIHP0KV1xyHbKB3JG4YWxS1n4RVo2Ju +FJA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53183x3aG0dUUKSy0iMqXo2GSnmSxyni1C/GLgSmMBvdHu1HifsA OP6uL7hfg4QJKRZECD1jMXPwAQRyXbCAUM5G0WlU736sF7M=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw78lS2RISBgCzRP81MIa+QjO4zULXxudLS50ubOuuS5DZvzqQRUdrRgy3LKyhl52rvI0hTLYvzB3o5/Hrac0A=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:684:: with SMTP id r4mr50098670qvz.54.1609342831364; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 07:40:31 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <9f6782b1-e85b-1a9c-9151-98feff7e18ea@mtcc.com> <CAHej_8m0OWsTt+tcSgUh+Fxu=HH_57nsb2O1Q_fgA2453ceh4g@mail.gmail.com> <140485eb-020f-4406-3f2f-e2c475ea51e5@mtcc.com> <CAHej_8mApfoF2ORgL+DoYTanrdhMjvT9H27kORwLKCQc1C9sRw@mail.gmail.com> <5588dbbe-b876-ed80-c80f-792380e3718f@mtcc.com> <CAHej_8=kW_t_JkOxUud1Uz8+PrbMh5CfwfxZK=mhe0wjW8wQpw@mail.gmail.com> <54dd9978-bcd1-6757-ad27-dcef6db6e5f7@mtcc.com> <CAHej_8kCi=7oqojDH_rbjn7kRg-PTDJWLgcKTGK9z-baUnKeMw@mail.gmail.com> <ef32de1e-d47e-1d0f-3cec-5994c7fdb7ae@mtcc.com> <CAHej_8kjSsQK_XEbdjWzV5npa29YjGadzD06Fmx3QLB4p+n_Cg@mail.gmail.com> <937f1019-a028-308d-2a0f-1e720fd49dcd@mtcc.com> <d8014c2a-c1c9-9eac-e64a-5f285bab7fd3@tana.it> <CAHej_8mgYr9ERAxmup+keZT5u8L+qgCxcSLH7Z=BEuZLouttpg@mail.gmail.com> <9c5f18c2-c5f6-4f66-a185-f684949738b5@mtcc.com> <CAHej_8mDb6MQk8y2mZZC6d4AD7Zi8xJDsbDn2=FoD+Bx-wVAkg@mail.gmail.com> <326d993e-0d92-206b-dd94-bef21ddfbaaa@mtcc.com>
In-Reply-To: <326d993e-0d92-206b-dd94-bef21ddfbaaa@mtcc.com>
From: Todd Herr <todd.herr@valimail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 10:40:15 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHej_8=Gaou-Mb1vkwxABXLt7a_de03EVgPdyjZTdjR_+7DrrA@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c9213805b7b05336"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/J2dhX3_IOkBjab5dolyx23PWoh0>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] auth-res vs. dmarc
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 15:40:35 -0000

On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 10:36 AM Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> wrote:

>
> On 12/30/20 7:31 AM, Todd Herr wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 8:56 AM Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 12/30/20 5:48 AM, Todd Herr wrote:
>>
>>
>> MDAs and local clients (web and mobile) at the mailbox provider will have
>> the information they need.
>>
>> No they don't. I keep saying this, but you guys keep dismissing me.
>> Painting up "fail" for p=none is absolutely the wrong thing to do. It is
>> not what the user expects to see for a piece of mail that is perfectly
>> acceptable to the originating domain. This is an error or omission, full
>> stop.
>>
>>
>>
> I'm sorry, but I don't know that I've seen an example of painting up
> "fail" for p=none in my Gmail or Google Apps clients; it is possible you
> can share a screencap of an example of what you're referring to here,
> please?
>
>
> I already said there is a thunderbird extension called dkim-verify that
> does exactly that. It says "DMARC: fail". That is highly misleading to the
> user.
>
>
>
I see.

I wrote "MDAs and local clients (web and mobile) at the mailbox provider",
and I was referring to things such as Gmail's web client, Gmail's mobile
client, etc.

You are talking about an extension for Thunderbird, which is different from
what I'm talking about.

Thank you for the clarification.

-- 

*Todd Herr* | Sr. Technical Program Manager
*e:* todd.herr@valimail.com
*p:* 703.220.4153


This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or
proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s)
authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized
recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or
distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited
and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to
this email and then delete it from your system.