Re: [dmarc-ietf] auth-res vs. dmarc

Seth Blank <seth@valimail.com> Wed, 30 December 2020 18:29 UTC

Return-Path: <seth@valimail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E6D93A0D06 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 10:29:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=valimail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mBw7I-A7FIGm for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 10:29:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe2d.google.com (mail-vs1-xe2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 497E43A0B37 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 10:29:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe2d.google.com with SMTP id e20so8942468vsr.12 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 10:29:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=valimail.com; s=google2048; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=JRiZR5U5hhgfxw/pwp0dKKhj56ogT6d2Zrw1kQ5Uirs=; b=QDyh29XszCMgid5B8ZtsZV4fC33VHFDwvNvVBmYhQXHL3BzYF4EL4TmewpQflOlVKo VdzJU9+dg5mW5rGUtFbF354RWfFBg3dcsxy2ZgcgSn+TUGz4G12kFarhf9T0ixjx6YmJ 2vbzmn6y962qkay9yHnJiiV1X41EqPDMJQ0qj3+Db5ZIODEJrWMGUNl7ZCCBVXXgrYo4 q8Q6fz6B9lOs0xmDe+jxcFz0r2r5wIUQ/gehzl43Zt9ZsHt5BQDZW+MJMqP9oQa0W3XG Z9KTe88U2L0QKpKFKVnio+3Mau/AT2tSJylY/qgGRm4lbcivrl5MS8eDI6OX2vFvy6fw HWCg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=JRiZR5U5hhgfxw/pwp0dKKhj56ogT6d2Zrw1kQ5Uirs=; b=lHZYDXbOGj3uKGQMc3mzoq44iKI38TmTrOuFPwAFICdGVfHDnRQtVQNC//GFlzL63v KpowqpIJkbrn31SGr6AJDCWbB3jwvTl7a8PlvL3+nzrKv29bKDB9+BmDnTWEZ3BfWLA/ hFc7REi31t//Y2TxQhIRm4jqczkmXBq4yXvaJ/+emPCrOK7+c8kimJloaT63F9WhSA6X 4zd8BubP9SvW4+aXpkECEYp74lfy7sPyhH3u6/voIVn24yjv6CDyxADbrH6Fan/bkR1h ad++R8A+TIT7HBgvs9LwOanwa8UrJFWxgA4xSQ31JdhcyXg5XKNK+oJ6SaoTPQTjz5EX lnWA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530lC6cOGAzZvOUafLlwfrPrwYtEO8g2boZaSZGsoMu7eRo/N8rC reU6C7duMfjRX0H0KPZmEYYnRTwDLZcDNxOSqHo/pA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyM+Fi75XevQaxKAlZPMoJXrsGLvTkEBf6yj1NpR/vJOqjYqByviD5niT2RG2PXWl5Nnn91E8aU6ucbAnm54vg=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:2427:: with SMTP id l7mr34579578vsi.43.1609352975158; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 10:29:35 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <9f6782b1-e85b-1a9c-9151-98feff7e18ea@mtcc.com> <5588dbbe-b876-ed80-c80f-792380e3718f@mtcc.com> <CAHej_8=kW_t_JkOxUud1Uz8+PrbMh5CfwfxZK=mhe0wjW8wQpw@mail.gmail.com> <54dd9978-bcd1-6757-ad27-dcef6db6e5f7@mtcc.com> <CAHej_8kCi=7oqojDH_rbjn7kRg-PTDJWLgcKTGK9z-baUnKeMw@mail.gmail.com> <ef32de1e-d47e-1d0f-3cec-5994c7fdb7ae@mtcc.com> <CAHej_8kjSsQK_XEbdjWzV5npa29YjGadzD06Fmx3QLB4p+n_Cg@mail.gmail.com> <937f1019-a028-308d-2a0f-1e720fd49dcd@mtcc.com> <d8014c2a-c1c9-9eac-e64a-5f285bab7fd3@tana.it> <CAHej_8mgYr9ERAxmup+keZT5u8L+qgCxcSLH7Z=BEuZLouttpg@mail.gmail.com> <72e20c17-e991-e82a-9120-a27097e3ac58@mtcc.com> <CAHej_8=6huc-N4ymDTOWZXHGjQQ-3RFDdomRzmGp4kOseHckMQ@mail.gmail.com> <7863d250-f56a-1fe1-44ee-fbc7486d48b4@mtcc.com> <CAJ4XoYdMdaE92UOrXvcAqm2iou+PCGg_uzHUsmBsYRe1PivBJw@mail.gmail.com> <502c2363-385c-b90c-a22a-716594967190@mtcc.com> <CAJ4XoYdP1bedYv+3MK3vrirfr5CTGvpiOxSO-zZ=9q7=Up9p0g@mail.gmail.com> <01fe63df-1960-868a-3351-08a24bb7a9cf@tana.it> <8e1d6a24-17f4-1fa8-d90a-883e3b8e7432@mtcc.com>
In-Reply-To: <8e1d6a24-17f4-1fa8-d90a-883e3b8e7432@mtcc.com>
From: Seth Blank <seth@valimail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 10:29:23 -0800
Message-ID: <CAOZAAfO9SEo3yFcFj5tqgBCzx=+_E23=7E8OvZ6J17aKq6ymhg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
Cc: dmarc@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000674c8905b7b2b0c4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/ckqgtnTxV8HoLRo8sq6lSGYdb0o>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] auth-res vs. dmarc
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 18:29:44 -0000

Thank you filing these tickets.

With regards to which tickets are actively open, I’ve asked the document
editors to push on open tickets, stand by.

On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 10:21 Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> wrote:

>
> On 12/30/20 10:13 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> > On Wed 30/Dec/2020 17:38:29 +0100 Dotzero wrote:
> >> And for the second time, that is not a DMARC problem, it is an
> >> auth-res problem.
> >
> >
> > Standardizing the result names for dmarc authentication method is an
> > integral part of DMARC specification.
> >
> > Added ticket 91
> > https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/ticket/91
> >
> I opened a ticket too which basically says that there should be a
> normative Authentication-Results Requirements section in the base
> specifications. That was a process error from the very beginning with
> auth-res and its weird semi-official status. I don't think it has ever
> been discussed whether it is even a protocol or not as Ned brought up
> (opened a ticket on that too).
>
> Mike
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>
-- 

*Seth Blank* | VP, Standards and New Technologies
*e:* seth@valimail.com
*p:* 415.273.8818


This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or
proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s)
authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized
recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or
distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited
and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to
this email and then delete it from your system.