IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] auth-res vs. dmarc

"Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com> Wed, 30 December 2020 02:50 UTC

Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68D2D3A0E0B for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 18:50:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=drkurt.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hto_MbWWIqnq for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 18:50:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-x136.google.com (mail-il1-x136.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6B753A0E0A for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 18:50:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-x136.google.com with SMTP id n9so13783651ili.0 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 18:50:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=fhZBNz2Ysj42q0wc5Ls3mZCldSZN+1ziIjK4mrCo+So=; b=K+AnSO2/Zi6Tq6bVOraMjDeoJZNaywoVYiA0Co+HqZuOX8YKxXc5DR4UfDu2zuQpzh 3/sRYcnuWL24+IDMxs8S7+0xDyKiJAMkljWJMvRHs0U2GwFTsFpFwQnIEm5sjePMIvca PiGO3/UUXh/vygcL0Z0tT7Vl1RhzHV+hRQ5bs=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fhZBNz2Ysj42q0wc5Ls3mZCldSZN+1ziIjK4mrCo+So=; b=g74onRgPrVQZ1h9MoDwK3AJPk8UTUFu3UY8ln+UICA2Df3roXb5PRS+FP65IGpuiE5 H1xhHgJ3Opmolkg+ZTE6/l9q4aFQacbx0n0ex2xF5izq4VCyWtAZHE1Rti8aJo6vPzpN fwSidKBVTJ7wnWB8zQFOW1bNJiHWP2T53vDe6IIq/4+Deb6MmNLJgkdagHkvQB9rX4vK oMDgxpcF8rG3509TF8NM5tZvyo2REowpXuRtmQ6N1Tx60pr2djPXyt2FJLOcUAPWK0ia jzccBSsddTZkvI66+d3s89Wj5UleHHwVwuZXmdH7YvRQyMPs8TFBAtYnverL8yvygJg6 csBA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530vvFSby7gqMbtTTW7fApWeiCPXvgKRZ0g1g8WNmftnyO1Wd21r yrDC/J38+kJK30ouYyXQ9Nw+yuiQEP71Jxr2egTP2IdcCYKXPw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxKz2b4TYw488LAyzcXPX/WuERgXJX/Mvwck4X1YuAIYPrtnvOSyOGbBMOOJxxBoH46tutRTrhx1auR+t95K2c=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:12cc:: with SMTP id i12mr51368866ilm.23.1609296627066; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 18:50:27 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <9f6782b1-e85b-1a9c-9151-98feff7e18ea@mtcc.com> <CAHej_8m0OWsTt+tcSgUh+Fxu=HH_57nsb2O1Q_fgA2453ceh4g@mail.gmail.com> <140485eb-020f-4406-3f2f-e2c475ea51e5@mtcc.com> <CAHej_8mApfoF2ORgL+DoYTanrdhMjvT9H27kORwLKCQc1C9sRw@mail.gmail.com> <5588dbbe-b876-ed80-c80f-792380e3718f@mtcc.com> <CAHej_8=kW_t_JkOxUud1Uz8+PrbMh5CfwfxZK=mhe0wjW8wQpw@mail.gmail.com> <54dd9978-bcd1-6757-ad27-dcef6db6e5f7@mtcc.com> <CAHej_8kCi=7oqojDH_rbjn7kRg-PTDJWLgcKTGK9z-baUnKeMw@mail.gmail.com> <ef32de1e-d47e-1d0f-3cec-5994c7fdb7ae@mtcc.com> <CAH48ZfyxXz-2Wpwmzi+mW_KSS0aS06+yiEOk3YB_UrOKdcsQjA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAH48ZfyxXz-2Wpwmzi+mW_KSS0aS06+yiEOk3YB_UrOKdcsQjA@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2020 18:50:16 -0800
Message-ID: <CABuGu1raONsO8coqr6Kndtp65SpYGwinvUFWLGqpCUqPVutMpg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Douglas Foster <dougfoster.emailstandards@gmail.com>
Cc: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000cb806f05b7a5912e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/n4Bm44ojgKNdpBN7jGfDMNuUcLE>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] auth-res vs. dmarc
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 02:50:29 -0000

On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 5:31 PM Douglas Foster <
dougfoster.emailstandards@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> DKIM, A-R, and ARC should all have a mandatory attribute indicating the
> HELO name of the server applying the header, the IP Address of the previous
> server which supplied the information being evaluated, or both.
>

With all due respect, it seems to me like this is something which should
have been pointed out before this WG came to final consensus on 8601 (aka
7601bis). A-R and AAR were not designed to be fed into a determinative
state machine.

--Kurt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email