IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC2 & SPF Dependency Removal

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Sun, 18 June 2023 00:41 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EE87C14CF1B for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Jun 2023 17:41:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lio9JyHvAExi for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Jun 2023 17:41:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x633.google.com (mail-ej1-x633.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::633]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCA63C15109F for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Jun 2023 17:41:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x633.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-98273ae42d0so66463966b.0 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Jun 2023 17:41:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1687048904; x=1689640904; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=kPFJ5yk3psP6CZmFX30zBpjgI4HbFUaiz3zP85V3R/4=; b=bNdWCMgXTlvlAGPee9PB9ox2Wz0+fXjg5IFHczgt5WxPFa2u5TTUUxUpPxmDm8h7HI 1ad//qWVzLA/n57ziS1uUNDR6cDznWqZb7CeAnAAmBFfmRulIvccrWQV/VKu9cJLISAX uG3baPNz5VHggasGwv916DI6e2HnpWM8jQt3hfmeDcgkbvnu2PS6OeEC8D9JrTBBIMLW m3V/HH6e3DNrG44osjlwyEFL0gfSMnCuR7dpZUBiwbk88C71QMw884tFNjAjlBMYqp+z ZSmxyQ3xG/wDvoIYuH9Uw20DvjlIDvVnsPzQI4eUFRL4Ss8pvf7iFdTBoCDhJ0toXv1G YLcg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1687048904; x=1689640904; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=kPFJ5yk3psP6CZmFX30zBpjgI4HbFUaiz3zP85V3R/4=; b=KHwBw04EHuGpw59MZO8G0RNpIdmUhBs2W95kowDItGiAe8mnFxb+aAtDFSiQxtzdF5 SiEu0wzcZ4fVZLlATPMMZ0h0HPN943cWO8UwA4tLW8FHWTRpRPcn8vHNWEogzIBK378v POGVb8CmIq1bj1oy6mfkTyR9ZOOCjA560aUktQ9lEPCkCeDJcmlS9f24uO4CJWYSCgYu JfJSVhJ7vI6sfhwgLdygqwr6mIedSmTFt2ARHsA/niNj2gqGuJQNjMx71i1l1gY8a69H rtCiGxWhzuXNBLvu8aehAuvWsiYrIT1wVryuoezhYAziEvAvWRT1bXziDWjWx3IWUpxJ UgSA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDxefJQO5I9eGyjN4HFBaZTipfIWC7N5wxK7F7KNH+RfK4cm9CVw Db3/KjkFlEoDHk1hFD6bZ716yQVTAekC1pTU/jk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ5YMsTHY4lNE60epPK5xnRQrpQJMIt2y2sYpN4C6COgqpmARJit2bBcilB7PqsvmSb7kqvOZbHZFOhX32w63g4=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:5198:b0:987:6960:36c8 with SMTP id y24-20020a170906519800b00987696036c8mr2306858ejk.7.1687048903684; Sat, 17 Jun 2023 17:41:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <30BB83B2-B454-41B8-992B-8E2569802D9C@1und1.de> <D225D7FC-C570-4B63-A694-9F16DB1F33E1@kitterman.com> <CALaySJKwuOK-81dW2H9dtURxa5mLQDUNo+MWcs+Hho8N+yP9qg@mail.gmail.com> <2817813.dRqVH37e0G@localhost> <CALaySJJbPFBAV_7mZaARYWuMzuX+74r2Cm0jD+z92_iuFRn_MQ@mail.gmail.com> <25736.57534.195344.782189@fireball.acr.fi> <1ec42959-977a-9ce0-907a-83a5eb2b6ef2@tana.it> <25739.5435.550786.601699@fireball.acr.fi> <25739.33240.127804.524371@fireball.acr.fi> <5d9a0b0f-8777-2494-d779-376c6ab8b37d@tana.it> <7d39aa8e-dacc-05fa-eff1-2cc350d521db@inboxsys.com> <CAH48ZfwyBwfKzG_3R5uyV6tmY0yUtWy=5yAoAOEhUGn_Rz6HNw@mail.gmail.com> <47b8a0c7-6a52-a4ad-e98e-8cb2f881713e@inboxsys.com> <285f2d2e-13fd-7cdc-c816-fba759f0745b@dusatko.org> <CAH48ZfzhyZK3RQHXH-PPk=sqY9gOtpA85vV-Myyo_RrEvOGu-Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAEYhs4F9=GDsCuQ9pAi8z-MBNHUJ9jZCwipT3Qe_YjaD65s9mA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAEYhs4F9=GDsCuQ9pAi8z-MBNHUJ9jZCwipT3Qe_YjaD65s9mA@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2023 17:41:30 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwaoie+6h2QWXF98TBBwYpN8fYf5O_Mr49YtG2vnAppgnw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ken Simpson <ksimpson@mailchannels.com>
Cc: Douglas Foster <dougfoster.emailstandards@gmail.com>, Jan Dušátko <jan=40dusatko.org@dmarc.ietf.org>, dmarc@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009f78c305fe5cae2b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/788e4ylPaJaRifamrj1rE5W57T8>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC2 & SPF Dependency Removal
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2023 00:41:46 -0000

On Sat, Jun 17, 2023 at 2:40 PM Ken Simpson <ksimpson@mailchannels.com>
wrote:

> FWIW, I'd like to chuck my hat in the ring on the side of removing SPF
> from the next iteration of DMARC. As the operator of an email delivery
> service with tens of millions of primarily uncontrolled senders on web
> hosting servers, it would be *great* if domain owners could assert via
> their DMARC record that receivers should only trust DKIM-signed email.
>

Can these senders not accomplish the same thing by removing the SPF record
altogether?

-MSK, participating

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email