IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] easier DKIM, DMARC2 & SPF Dependency Removal

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Thu, 29 June 2023 18:38 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0388CC14F75F for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jun 2023 11:38:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.847
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.847 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b="Aj3fM5os"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b="qjIqSQuG"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PiyODaKiwl3o for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jun 2023 11:38:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BF57C14CEFD for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Jun 2023 11:37:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 48197 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2023 18:37:56 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=bc43.649dcf84.k2306; bh=T1AeKwHyBwHLH4fsSVqXma5Jc1PyD+XTEuphnAA4A+o=; b=Aj3fM5os6HqT3VyMWBuigkN9pGwdw9CEeJdS8sGHcHSExwd0Ti0sHzW/qjp83BBE41qvGXzIWyQC+Og7IZyEaHaKag3XYJeIr+BEj3psl4JkvBbC0djWLWZrQKhC7wOz/1qhY89MB8oy5lzBtx82pfjDm1sP0Z09umsHW/z0A3Y4yP0xqyqoa/8VwDAiji65qqSJArBd7xS7qCefm2kwSLSJ3kqK9xb7zahyUJAqy+U942c1oFwzVsQuEdmzOtI3utdgywGBobvTKfVZI3vfu42XiPr35ZYRrqACIfY7ObpRVv3E9j7Em1mhCg0W266NnmKukdrR+mlbs7JIFPf89g==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=bc43.649dcf84.k2306; bh=T1AeKwHyBwHLH4fsSVqXma5Jc1PyD+XTEuphnAA4A+o=; b=qjIqSQuG9oC0M7hB9cxUkYWWkaMsQsBba7VZ//saGoEmr/0mRIf2+CA+lSnLR8fXTd9KXhxi7xFQloiL2TsggJoAUEitOrdC6SHtq/EkUsDzT7TBtxsBxvzMaZSAXvhjeUSnd6MpnTSXjA0H7wm4TFqgqp5MJTkkPXUL5d0elfbXq5E9tevdib4Q4QkNF3KspMwafJio6pwUTaJT/mQyve9xgMYxdTgQfpYRf017DNWgsmNCgVFhahuxLmccvqWIbbXy/Gr90WDiy1METYn7vaCwkqm8NzeHWbfX/Ef0amcKDjKkbxF5f3unE5smWcstJUSD8K6zogofCVw0GaLP9Q==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 29 Jun 2023 18:37:56 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id E9837FD1EC3A; Thu, 29 Jun 2023 14:37:55 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 14:37:55 -0400
Message-Id: <20230629183755.E9837FD1EC3A@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Cc: emschorsch@google.com
In-Reply-To: <CAFcYR_VhM4tsop7WwLZaLY6JhDJBiGO4E96HLzm4eqbdR+U3Pw@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/vvLKPABLtMRtcyu1SYIyX3vb6jc>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] easier DKIM, DMARC2 & SPF Dependency Removal
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 18:38:27 -0000

It appears that Emanuel Schorsch  <emschorsch@google.com> said:
>> We are talking about SPF AND DKIM because of the problems with DKIM
>> replay. ...

I hope we agree that applying bandaids to sort of fix DKIM replay is
out of scope for the DMARC WG.

If you want to work on replay, they're down the virtual hall.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/dkim/about/

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email