IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] easier DKIM, DMARC2 & SPF Dependency Removal

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Fri, 30 June 2023 19:32 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B7E9C1519AA for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Jun 2023 12:32:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Oxax31vnZtR8 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Jun 2023 12:32:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x62c.google.com (mail-ej1-x62c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DD87C1519A5 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Jun 2023 12:32:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x62c.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-991f9148334so60317666b.1 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Jun 2023 12:32:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1688153571; x=1690745571; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=nbCD5kW2vEhx2fijzkDBh5UpnWay5ajdqxLJhH68yeo=; b=bULPrUylkjuAZhv6fZE6pD9ew0kvqJHGZEbme5jwZ76lXq8L2qU3MxcHqqwhD73CyS bnYKdx3t7tocOOuqtj/on8sK21Q70y1AI9jIQY2d0IDFj1eq8Fa8/1CEtOwm07Wf6svh RWOTkeXmGmTLrQEXO1RLov4dlPETp2/4Lh5DzT9RZgly1GXEznOnCmtZCgbBpsMJ7shm fZx+nwu7mzryBhMIbFfHIyuDm8qWkommY5u9tFPUpHSij+PHZFSUfAsZzACSjyYTnm9k EIjDDHCMb778wLrB6Bs4I5oC7gpwA6PgAQ7v3bLHcf03TOERDpMbzC4dF86W4CSZU6RA T8Bw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1688153571; x=1690745571; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=nbCD5kW2vEhx2fijzkDBh5UpnWay5ajdqxLJhH68yeo=; b=ZOkVFg5oafsVP3rqE/MUtLhcPlNEobl4z0fhLeI3RLXN035J59hKg+hYe8qqj4SNuq WgpzeQ3laat7pVIgTZos4bQqQ8P+kd87THyC9+cLSZ8QQr0AjUS5lAJoEq6fqMjrhqDZ RxS3gFZHWyyAGW4xsOQf6vz3vsoMjVRti3kUtnkTbUUzQRmriRDyjkHDTmBr8Xsxg5EN R/cuWxQL1BXAkDSvf5uhfdH9Q64oieIYd9CbxUfhX5+0KfDAGRSlP5fgG/0TYL6gD447 SprFUBr16WhhWC/iB/UbKs3KZYWGlxGmS86lm3e7gYwEv5+1qFI7NPlshPnGYPwyVIz9 Xb7g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABy/qLbC9+uUW0PX8UMLupPtNP43D3s+eT1jnRB9QTBbGhIzbVZ/nyu3 80CK1y5AxSBh4ndpFb+4xddm28t+1DYw5FJBR/Q/KCBT
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlGIERSgbkx4UJBeehXxcaRQ+hyhqas/LWza/834hdWw5uv4SSZrFSJnqV6RcY8NcLTWuASFU/c/e9Kool7XgjU=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:ee1:b0:98e:32d:c390 with SMTP id x1-20020a1709060ee100b0098e032dc390mr260612eji.5.1688153571210; Fri, 30 Jun 2023 12:32:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20230623021810.E5F8DF9B3B94@ary.qy> <6495D504.4090809@isdg.net> <839aa10b-f7fa-c7a2-76db-6441189afca2@dusatko.org> <CALaySJ+gcVvpzJcrpUbOkOvjUFAhzw=pZovpZC7BhW_x7VW7nA@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwasxzqJt7Hr7gZd86C=ivCrDUci_i6pkJJUTnqzL1pHMA@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJ+gjR6D-OSE_07iSH2zXa7wypUQwPN1cL-1s+NC2S4L8g@mail.gmail.com> <99e1ef2d-053b-8cfe-f369-fa8475d142ae@tana.it> <CALaySJKZoAPTT-+cZEww+y2eUsDbNXcybb=Z7RxNLyfzPMr7ng@mail.gmail.com> <d3986316-02f9-9d73-be81-37af7cfd40a7@tana.it> <CALaySJLtUtKNtP4__pOryFLaAODjiEx-nbdvF9tL6wYhcRCe_g@mail.gmail.com> <877A1137-3A55-424A-A9C5-FCCA4F2D5436@kitterman.com> <c3adb721-fa6c-a285-a7db-067260d83f41@dusatko.org>
In-Reply-To: <c3adb721-fa6c-a285-a7db-067260d83f41@dusatko.org>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2023 12:32:38 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwZ_BpLegRFtU_E=rgkh+nV_hK6TCh0TEOCg-gbTP3B_2A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jan Dušátko <jan=40dusatko.org@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: dmarc@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f03bc005ff5de1ca"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/NPre4DTnMKwnRDv0QD0FLAmvmkg>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] easier DKIM, DMARC2 & SPF Dependency Removal
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2023 19:32:53 -0000

On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 12:21 AM Jan Dušátko <jan=
40dusatko.org@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Scott, Barry,
> as far as I understand, SPF are historic technology,
>

Not in any official capacity.  RFC 7208 is a Proposed Standard.  In fact,
in IETF terms, it enjoys higher status than DMARC does right now.

The status of these protocols is not under discussion.  The only question
is whether DMARC should continue to factor SPF results into its output.

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email