Re: [dmarc-ietf] easier DKIM, DMARC2 & SPF Dependency Removal

Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> Tue, 27 June 2023 08:35 UTC

Return-Path: <vesely@tana.it>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF4B6C15155F for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 01:35:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=tana.it header.b="VuNHSW+U"; dkim=pass (1152-bit key) header.d=tana.it header.b="CNH4Vc49"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NasZebht4T5G for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 01:34:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wmail.tana.it (wmail.tana.it [94.198.96.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7286DC140675 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 01:34:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=epsilon; t=1687854891; bh=W6iNZnwx5THc2JNtodWHw7iK5J8zaxcBsdyDAp/1pgw=; h=Author:Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=VuNHSW+UkCTVE3aT61MDqUiOBBAPnZk5mfahJ0lszFJEoGnQlAopcBjhs65Lhl85Z UrmeFBOGLBvpRVIKku5Dg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=delta; t=1687854891; bh=W6iNZnwx5THc2JNtodWHw7iK5J8zaxcBsdyDAp/1pgw=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=CNH4Vc49bPUbIRDke3pn5l2sNy8cleAe98dt02mCSp20wCUDqITeG7dPwzhjGL3wk dAVVHTZH4JTjJWZso3dGU3tUQavehqH9riCz/FrVl3MdXvkz/Nzz6HqxoqFsDlkb3Q 2iDdSxdhuK2u0Csm+5bOdX5jOB+B7DgPFTND9SL8GRVRe0tN8kU2FmutRhmmX
Original-Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] easier DKIM, DMARC2 & SPF Dependency Removal
Author: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Received: from [172.25.197.111] (pcale.tana [172.25.197.111]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 uXDGrn@SYT0/k, TLS: TLS1.3, 128bits, ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) by wmail.tana.it with ESMTPSA id 00000000005DC04A.00000000649A9F2B.00000A8C; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 10:34:51 +0200
Message-ID: <89205d6b-4d5b-326e-c0d6-a6001997ab9c@tana.it>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 10:34:51 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0
Content-Language: en-US, it-IT
To: dmarc@ietf.org
References: <20230623021810.E5F8DF9B3B94@ary.qy> <6495D504.4090809@isdg.net> <839aa10b-f7fa-c7a2-76db-6441189afca2@dusatko.org> <CALaySJ+gcVvpzJcrpUbOkOvjUFAhzw=pZovpZC7BhW_x7VW7nA@mail.gmail.com> <b78cb14a-d641-fabd-a67c-f099b8fae3f9@tana.it> <CAH48Zfwm4YZ1Px4NG-Vo8n-S1Gj7vps=JrYw0-zyHx4N8qWhkw@mail.gmail.com>
Authentication-Results: tana.it; auth=pass (details omitted)
From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
In-Reply-To: <CAH48Zfwm4YZ1Px4NG-Vo8n-S1Gj7vps=JrYw0-zyHx4N8qWhkw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/tFnoXL0vTrwo49_Gs70KjVj9hBY>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] easier DKIM, DMARC2 & SPF Dependency Removal
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 08:35:02 -0000

On Mon 26/Jun/2023 19:32:53 +0200 Douglas Foster wrote:
> DKIM+SPF says "our domain, including subdomains covered by this policy,
> will never use an ESP".  (Since most ESP messages pass SPF based on the ESP
> domain)


ESPs can provide include files for those who wish otherwise.


Best
Ale
--