IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Version bump: was DMARC2 & SPF Dependency Removal

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 10 June 2023 19:58 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDC8AC152F21 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Jun 2023 12:58:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6cFIFQEk9oLn for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Jun 2023 12:58:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x62e.google.com (mail-ej1-x62e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5898CC152F1A for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Jun 2023 12:58:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x62e.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-977cf86aae5so443651966b.0 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Jun 2023 12:58:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1686427088; x=1689019088; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=tN+D3lB4DxlY/cNJ87bB7feR7YUEP+/1CIsv+OdfWcM=; b=daucfPvEvOrIl9e/RlNn6AJKbmBOo8NgEgCSc5mGMzR7MCkFNbXGbsrS0dE7ex6tDD ZQUX0+tWC76tC3Ha00y05J2VocrYFhbHFuzXtY4/xEY58gu+fRj+Itb/k+PZKCI5XGE1 ZO0dMRxoCHKezGbLFJWXhL+0elLfwi9s2tHZbQGlscyTaX9RFMNe5YlgQUJI2qrozUuI EmWQ1owmOxN7/p0391TkMUGZjdkrAr6x3LQZNHhFt2DT6vz7tycqZVnKLsapchoqvFGm Cq5mPruCja8egfhVWPl9UXUsE4QG+rBeJcton/OMGEbH6OlMJumYgL8AFb+KvixTaCIx kV3A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1686427088; x=1689019088; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=tN+D3lB4DxlY/cNJ87bB7feR7YUEP+/1CIsv+OdfWcM=; b=fNJF6KQQ05+y2MZKYre2idq3taLjwojdz6YZlyefkMBWBvDQ8MVC7DpPbclEqvHOth 5SvkJLHDA4bFArNj/r8jQ9dyZAmW17+6gZ3ViuavttEwGuJ8PsFhTvRMhw1R97hpGmZ/ yz/eB8PvIJpAg1wXqQOLiYxjcQEunyrcsV8W1L3OdxypjFXRfhLJ/wgx6xHs7SzyyE6K Fn7TWOWsve5fci3crZDH0JF9j/DP/hXikqS1DVTqWWv2RM8/ygllM+SL31/riQqrxOC1 NgZcWXkm1MKnzStb5Vj9R0iRhXQ6AbnAr6bkIKsLDSS3sFabBdwl3lzpwhIsD6AziyW3 d5VQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDwo2+mpMQw9lyAfWr+/63Yuf2OS3F3Cz+atY+j4Am3MmQ2EZ7Dx hpRzBsr/yEXUan9pGbQK4+JcSi8sMhrI3R8tUaTiwWT9
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ75EOEFdoMBCsiQczOK403u5bbnLPcSfhKhGndI8azpx4dR5eLZ4bTIfbT0FwbigKkvhqxVhK7HQPgCewe9hRM=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:6288:b0:974:1c90:4c02 with SMTP id nd8-20020a170907628800b009741c904c02mr4388688ejc.5.1686427087425; Sat, 10 Jun 2023 12:58:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <30BB83B2-B454-41B8-992B-8E2569802D9C@1und1.de> <502ADE6F-E01E-4DF0-BF79-6A5E810A3F96@kitterman.com> <CADyWQ+FrU2Mo3vurUHtfXQZdWGrjuiBu5OVkctte90Nen0-AWw@mail.gmail.com> <A610310C-75F3-4810-BF11-6AF7BF4EAE31@kitterman.com>
In-Reply-To: <A610310C-75F3-4810-BF11-6AF7BF4EAE31@kitterman.com>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2023 15:57:56 -0400
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+GM11H8Q51LfjWVW5+YBeoVthDo834LAW3=-YKxBGgogw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
Cc: dmarc@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007c54ca05fdcbe7bd"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/DrlqVncqDg1tfpb6vYabPpq9trQ>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Version bump: was DMARC2 & SPF Dependency Removal
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2023 19:58:09 -0000

On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 3:55 PM Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
wrote:

> To the extent we might need it so far, I think the psd= tag is that flag.
>


I am totally good with that.

tim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email