Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionality

Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> Wed, 09 December 2020 14:39 UTC

Return-Path: <vesely@tana.it>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A0D43A16BB for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 06:39:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.121
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.121 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1152-bit key) header.d=tana.it
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hu0_GHqQg0nS for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 06:39:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wmail.tana.it (wmail.tana.it [62.94.243.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EA1A3A16B8 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 06:39:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=delta; t=1607524790; bh=KDx18Q6DFN1rWL8JtwOZd9fP+RPSE+fYyiFFLxFwMiA=; l=463; h=To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=BrA0if74JX+Ji6KRiTOczzXiqWw7wqxnFviJLPttzSO11RzFnDaEESP84dQqHn4Nl oqomzI3jel7yYJq+mVKHlWarF27Zkma7SG8tB9O+ZPBa1Ivr1PyvrZIMqw+5oPljTw q8yRx8YWUI5tujiGGpuBT+h2hZ6eUVRp3p4VOr/HvBgPIcf/Cx52vjS/9JxeT
Authentication-Results: tana.it; auth=pass (details omitted)
Original-From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Received: from [172.25.197.111] (pcale.tana [172.25.197.111]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 uXDGrn@SYT0/k, TLS: TLS1.3, 128bits, ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) by wmail.tana.it with ESMTPSA id 00000000005DC056.000000005FD0E1B6.00006DC5; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 15:39:50 +0100
To: dmarc@ietf.org
References: <20201208235623.77A662938D42@ary.qy>
From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Message-ID: <5e600200-0ac7-5752-9387-eb64cbb6325b@tana.it>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 15:39:50 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20201208235623.77A662938D42@ary.qy>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/EG6ZceEvTGqwnnl69wtmj9jQ1N8>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionality
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2020 14:39:55 -0000

On Wed 09/Dec/2020 00:56:22 +0100 John Levine wrote:
> In article <cde83285-5cf1-41f0-6df2-b89637cfc7cb@taugh.com> you write:
> 
> I must admit one thing that did surprise me was that something is looking at
> DMARC DNS records and probing the https URIs they contain, since that is the
> only place there are referecnes to my newly created https reporting URI.


dmreport.abuse.net was published on the DNS.  That's enough for probing.


Best
Ale
--