Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionality

Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> Sun, 24 January 2021 19:10 UTC

Return-Path: <mike@fresheez.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A47FF3A0FF1 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 11:10:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.149
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.149 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mtcc.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5AKzy3XYFRQR for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 11:10:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1036.google.com (mail-pj1-x1036.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1036]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E2A63A0FF0 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 11:10:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1036.google.com with SMTP id j12so6976192pjy.5 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 11:10:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mtcc.com; s=fluffulence; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=4MviK1euX6FbQjFiveXT99o4DKUgMTjOSBcTpFFNryw=; b=kcoF70JGurCXFhFMn2qgKVYjhD7IouzU9jrvE+IWU26kjETfpwiJVT3DAahaB6QO2e D03fdwe8qgjrh2MySM5Rb7W2NU3AyXe/Duqb+w1kg6X5J3rkx+HbeyXTTUjrDzEgj3++ rpnA8AI8NRC9CnEe9F3ox6APTxBg3W2Cjy9foYePASYfNT1Jq0+ZMNZLxohZ+yiFjWkK BXgDz4teCmQzqz3wM+hGpdlJSPuei4Q6Rv6+fsFp8jqwcaqvAajD3xwPm17KI+1iOQkB XI2vVyElqhgVOzgC7BHMpTaoRyHhftGphHF1C/HVEzlKjbJMwIUMGuLUtjW1OAj5c/GO ytdg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=4MviK1euX6FbQjFiveXT99o4DKUgMTjOSBcTpFFNryw=; b=pbgBuwWwwunzcn6Wq32QFIoJTzfr4yZ+uVojU4h7Vs1+MuvvmGYWf4bo9FYuxZzhGs pTnUsv0fUfulgGlAQnxoiuNTATwrtya/Re/Bvq3G8ur109GABidUlMCI46+xAVdbydT/ S4l3tYtbi/qM1cOpP3QQv8KWvKyh/MUEQ3La1OIraH4sCmbztolwurs/Rm6/qw+s9z4Q zlsRLOLKmvnpGqsiGafn4t8guaWzLvw4IBhJjiofYV/y5iDyKEh3WMepQyURGGYZmxeI PdOeGi1yCxfecinaDGRytHlGDn5l4bQgJtxt9lnvMKM43PmJpb9PWHmHDsWK98JSgs9K BC5Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531befKwTTTqYMtjOPq6DPyDT+i4indNIqMZlOhfPjgsN6IN/pUs wQQMnnsoNNJEdshTPdyCD0CU3rYzdut+kA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxXcKAc8R/I2vGUE9IJtElDpbo8sMrp88xSajFy8aEmM2jf/b7xCSOW2zL8pz7abEtj11TbRA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:6407:: with SMTP id g7mr8277145pjj.56.1611515433439; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 11:10:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mike-mac.lan (107-182-35-22.volcanocom.com. [107.182.35.22]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n1sm13910917pfu.28.2021.01.24.11.10.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 24 Jan 2021 11:10:32 -0800 (PST)
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, dmarc@ietf.org
References: <20210124190826.380E26C07CF4@ary.qy>
From: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
Message-ID: <c682449b-6e7a-60b5-73a8-8497aa3a1929@mtcc.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2021 11:10:31 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20210124190826.380E26C07CF4@ary.qy>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/zKPa24R2pE4w9T3nVgEP7MRh5iA>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionality
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2021 19:10:36 -0000

any reporting needs to be authenticated. if you're going to use http, 
you need to show how you're going to do that.

Mike

On 1/24/21 11:08 AM, John Levine wrote:
> In article <dd3da825-bb39-6c37-762c-39ce5422f87a@mtcc.com> you write:
>> issue #99 needs to be addressed.
> I don't see any connection between issue 99 and this proposal.  This is not about failure reports.
>
> R's,
> John
>
>> On 1/24/21 10:46 AM, John Levine wrote:
>>> Here's a concrete proposal for https reporting:
>>>
>>> In draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting, in the transport section,
>>> between Email and Other Methods add:
>>>
>>> Https POST
>>>
>>> The message is an XML file with GZIP compression, sent with an https POST message
>>> to the given URI as media type application/gzip.
>>> The data SHOULD contain the filename described in Email transport
>>> above as the filename in the gzip header. The filename helps recipient
>>> hosts recognize duplicate reports.
>>>
>>> In draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis section 6.3 under the rua tag, add:
>>>
>>> If there is more than one URI in the value, the URIs are conceptually evaluated from
>>> left to right and each report is delivered to each URI in turn.
>>> If a delivery to an "https:" URI succeeds, any subsequent URIs that are not "https:" are ignored.
>>> This allows a report recipient to prefer https reports while falling back to mailto reports.
>>>
>>> R's,
>>> John
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dmarc mailing list
>>> dmarc@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>