IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionality

Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> Thu, 21 January 2021 09:44 UTC

Return-Path: <vesely@tana.it>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC7D63A1865 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 01:44:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.382
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.262, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1152-bit key) header.d=tana.it
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l1p8oqZYbRbY for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 01:44:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wmail.tana.it (wmail.tana.it [62.94.243.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8D5C3A1864 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 01:44:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=delta; t=1611222276; bh=1VvUanyV8SnyxUKAOAf6Q6U7o7+xgIWYNHLrptNgp2Q=; l=589; h=To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=Bb08pMwJQLBBWIQppNEsu+z8GwEceaJX4opPunKjmExMWKOQj42TVDw9PjL9c3lHB krJSlbkpTom7lQv8N0zmNCPME7njIO8i4TYZlJVhh6cym9u/qD70t/iAoLymQ0Y9Hb 1NcxSeByxAhm5K2smrsyAmIydX636sBCkMT5tyCAR3ipAKsKQPaIJMq+aQDKn
Authentication-Results: tana.it; auth=pass (details omitted)
Original-From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Received: from [172.25.197.111] (pcale.tana [172.25.197.111]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 uXDGrn@SYT0/k, TLS: TLS1.3, 128bits, ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) by wmail.tana.it with ESMTPSA id 00000000005DC056.0000000060094D04.00007320; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 10:44:36 +0100
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, dmarc@ietf.org
References: <20210120023151.3C86A6B7C86C@ary.qy> <ccc2489b-742d-acca-58db-55519764b02f@tana.it> <132aa0a-bd63-9ed1-e3d-75b23f46f15@taugh.com>
From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Message-ID: <a18942d2-817d-4771-4466-6aaa07dfd707@tana.it>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 10:44:35 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <132aa0a-bd63-9ed1-e3d-75b23f46f15@taugh.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/ZJ75kdF_7HaAsJredE44T0rCCdk>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionality
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 09:44:41 -0000

On Wed 20/Jan/2021 20:19:23 +0100 John R Levine wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jan 2021, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
>> John's record looks more workable, but it's still fluffy:
>>
>> "v=DMARC1; p=none; rf=afrf; 
>> rua=mailto:dmarc-a@abuse.net,https://dmreport.abuse.net/dmreport/; 
>> ruf=mailto:dmarc-f@abuse.net"
> 
> Whaddaya mean fluffy?  Try a PUT or POST to that URI and it'll work.


Surely you don't expect a DMARC report generator to parse https: and scream out 
"Oh Gosh, here's what I've been hopelessly waiting for...".  For non-human 
parsers, it's fluff, no?


Best
Ale
--

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email