IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-10.txt

"Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com> Thu, 25 February 2021 16:42 UTC

Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2C323A1C1F for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 08:42:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=drkurt.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dh9WDW63W5JT for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 08:42:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd34.google.com (mail-io1-xd34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CA0D3A1C1D for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 08:42:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd34.google.com with SMTP id u20so6517949iot.9 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 08:42:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ZlIMjycjmc5cCzO9hYGoAOb3lrNn87bTlYOIbYjtwDg=; b=C1cOzq6XAsiVCt6p9+iyVF5lfDl/ZcqpcFMP98H3qMsse6c0gP0BEwqwXU7Wk4yOOi ljq2S7weHJGBhCDoNVKpiQZcwRYxYkpRQOnH8R2/uEqK7memd+8ASpCDHt1GAQXkRkVf nz86vobID6mtA1BBxqAS/IN3x12563pfl9h/8=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ZlIMjycjmc5cCzO9hYGoAOb3lrNn87bTlYOIbYjtwDg=; b=fan+o3S2+l7dVq5vGFnYTZdOVnJYCALr80Jt3vHLjskFz8fe6+SkDu9V12kp8z0E3h QA/EkW3g01JOibHmWr+YzUNm4uDfHv4L7PIJEpeURjxKZZjVZZjbyVhtiWxFbiTITNEx FtJkZRb4X7XT+bMoQMq7gmrHwUl964gcSD5/TpAw71wdS/gcRJCFAfn7ImlhHs/6RjuB jJRM52SR5MBilHedAOovwistVsi7/5CCpzmnBTHQBsvHmmSFXy2ktTg++qJPfGfzpkBZ qenbtuMZF67+ZDxPJWUusQ4gte3sIrzISAycPrl84g1ifBil4Uacw3PsaLXt29wNFika 42cg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531lKGt0UXKozUGCSwYriTHP3c0qu1txFbFaK4MOHQSqAddwIbyB NdBaFTRacStCC1AVDx5vxZIbswOJFcYZSKAQiZUOFg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw2jfIlQ5L3CvPtEJd4aLAuK/oXlaWXcPvbLT8orcuF9kBwYnfUzYgG3R5Oa93qRUZn4L5wslwJYhbzDYjCMvI=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:eca:: with SMTP id q10mr4031577jas.116.1614271326236; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 08:42:06 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <161144436332.13490.10651420808048876097@ietfa.amsl.com> <CADyWQ+EhD0nz71dLtUFwb9V_6uuen-k6E5fpvrCg3ZYzfr2JSw@mail.gmail.com> <ba38a9e4-7f43-c747-2d90-f35de22a8399@gmail.com> <CAL0qLwZJaEBrXdE9JOZNOJAgR7iEzfMA86Csi2sNtE5JC7ROUQ@mail.gmail.com> <c5cd9239-b204-255a-48a3-1cdccf18464a@gmail.com> <CAL0qLwYrcg__sewPO+EWfJf-5uoHcnQpFqtw-QoXxngHTJvkAA@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVDCeFQU9RTN6osPTrMpap-Djkx5+Czx=-nKqVeXnyEy1Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwZXkRMLXS7mt28-vEKKk4HgWkP98P8kdYaS1XbcYQvSxQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJLVGhaBhrmDSYayYrcU9JSq_pY6D8=KoirUGCrOeKeHCQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVARxfJNUs+ve1ViDTF385QjLoyhw8JyKc-nALhuu=xoPA@mail.gmail.com> <81c05041-a4ad-a473-701c-0027cd503696@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <81c05041-a4ad-a473-701c-0027cd503696@gmail.com>
From: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 08:41:54 -0800
Message-ID: <CABuGu1pncrHQ-Ba7t7VEcbYrjfoc_Ek_3B5X66owSE2GWRdPSg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
Cc: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f8cbb205bc2bd4a8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/wFiws1Iru-3sMdOD06vA37OI_OQ>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-10.txt
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 16:42:09 -0000

This is getting much better - thanks for all the wordsmithing. I have one
nuance to add...

On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 6:13 AM Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> The suggested revisions to Barry's suggested revisions, below, primarily
> serve to reference the PSD construct without needing to reference the
> PSL.  And, of course, there are various other suggested wording tweaks...
>
> EVEN NEWER
>     Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and
>     Conformance (DMARC) permits a mail-originating
>     organization to express domain-level policies and preferences for
>     message validation, disposition, and reporting, which a mail-receiving
>     organization can use to improve mail handling.
>

Especially in the case of the PSD policies, one should not expect that the
controlling organization would necessarily be "a mail-originating
organization". Generally the idea is to *disavow* being such :-)

Suggested alternate text:

Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance (DMARC)
permits a domain-controlling
organization to express domain-level policies and preferences for message
validation, disposition, and reporting,
which a mail-receiving organization can use to improve mail handling.

--Kurt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email