Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps

"John Levine" <> Wed, 08 February 2017 15:11 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id E49C8129BC6 for <>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 07:11:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ityaipfyn-My for <>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 07:11:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF887129B83 for <>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 07:11:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 88364 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2017 15:11:23 -0000
Received: from unknown ( by with QMQP; 8 Feb 2017 15:11:23 -0000
Date: 8 Feb 2017 15:11:01 -0000
Message-ID: <20170208151101.14753.qmail@ary.lan>
From: "John Levine" <>
In-Reply-To: <>
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 15:11:25 -0000

In article <> you write:
>Biggest problem with the draft: it fails to mention the only real
>technical problem with RFC 6761, the lack of a formal language for the
>registry, thus preventing the programmers of resolving software to
>compile automatically the code for the various cases.

Considering the vastly different ways that software handles .local and
.onion and and, and that next thing to
come along (.homenet?) will likely be different from any of the
existing ones, this strikes me as akin to asking for a pony.

If you just want a list of the names so your recursive resolver can
stub them out, we already have that, of course.