Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps
"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Fri, 03 February 2017 02:42 UTC
Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EF9D129ADF for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 18:42:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ynIa_Soj29vc for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 18:42:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3A5C129AD6 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 18:42:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 85527 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2017 02:42:31 -0000
Received: from unknown (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 3 Feb 2017 02:42:31 -0000
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2017 02:42:09 -0000
Message-ID: <20170203024209.3584.qmail@ary.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <6545B2F1-15C6-41F6-ABF0-2D3E6983F4AB@gmail.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/jg6QG4nBJ-RB9jQTYqFrxyI2dok>
Cc: suzworldwide@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2017 02:42:34 -0000
>If not, can you suggest changes that would get your support for advancing it? (“Send text” if possible!) It's closer than I had remembered. In the problem paragraph that starts at the bottom of page 6, on domain names that have been commandeered, I'd like it to say that there is no agreement on how to decide that a name has been comandeered, nor if or how to revisit a name to decide that it's been uncomandeered. (For that last, I'm thinking about .BELKIN, where the routers that leak the name will eventually all fail, or .CORP where people may use it less now that CAs don't sign certs any more.) I'd also like a mention of DNSSEC. DNSSEC is intended to provide a signature chain from the root to any leaf, but there is no way to chain to a SUTLD. There's also no agreement what to do with DNSSEC and existing SUTLDs, whether to have DNSSEC say they don't exist, or to create some sort of unsigned pseudo-delegation, or something else. R's, John
- [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps Suzanne Woolf
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps Jeremy Rand
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps Suzanne Woolf
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps Russ Housley
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps Ralph Droms
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps Suzanne Woolf
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps John R Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] RFC 6761 vs. 6303 WGLC for draft-ietf… John R Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] RFC 6761 vs. 6303 WGLC for draft-ietf… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps Ralph Droms
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps Avri Doria
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps Russ Housley
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps Russ Housley
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps Edward Lewis
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps Ralph Droms
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-s… Edward Lewis
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-s… Edward Lewis