Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps
Jeremy Rand <jeremyrand@airmail.cc> Fri, 03 February 2017 15:34 UTC
Return-Path: <jeremyrand@airmail.cc>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57791129C48 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 07:34:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=airmail.cc
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IuIZX62UqlMn for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 07:34:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cock.li (cock.li [185.100.85.212]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B7C0129C41 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 07:34:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=airmail.cc; s=mail; t=1486136076; bh=ZDveUHkAMLvMRWvgMGRyPr+UbtamxftCkvHYWzuRfrM=; h=Reply-To:Subject:References:To:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Pd/TA7OfvuQJw2nEZWJV4yNj9bOi/oAj1cTDjjIEYYRl3kppjoUxKt9YjLCYo5LGd ATj6j1PTYi/+eBgAvj6tbd1t0KOFQUsVe1RAO5iGFsQnIXVAM8zqgdEUSKRxoAO9rW /4CPS8mHnXaCBb1IGZCQ74yS7uuEepnV/8qVhs0ZqTlh7ehZY6+feYXy7kIwXgJ5N8 PFyzq/mzXpmE7SJDfGYraV0mjR70Z0zBSzwSKozjAgfsCJXeako6ZDbeHS11eTNNHS wvbs6arNoUb5QSvfnQrWLx4HW8RH4wgdhYFxASRKBBK8SyiSi41Eaq34eS4Ev5RPK5 u3RBlFA6xeQsA==
References: <6545B2F1-15C6-41F6-ABF0-2D3E6983F4AB@gmail.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
From: Jeremy Rand <jeremyrand@airmail.cc>
Message-ID: <f660f4dd-02f0-dfa6-aa76-1632d08bc668@airmail.cc>
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2017 15:34:41 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6545B2F1-15C6-41F6-ABF0-2D3E6983F4AB@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oIVVcE56QUnAnKdESWA7GOtwujd1FO1aV"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/7LamPXibZYwD0h9BgO61Iionn-8>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: jeremy@veclabs.net
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2017 15:34:46 -0000
Suzanne Woolf: > This message opens a Working Group Last Call for: > > "Special-Use Names Problem Statement" > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps/> > Proposed status: informational > > Starts: 2 Feb. 2017 > Ends: 23 Feb. 2017 (3 weeks) > > Discussion should go to the mailing list. > > Is this draft ready to advance for publication as an Informational RFC, and as guidance for possible updates to RFC 6761? Does it describe the relevant issues clearly, and cover all the relevant ones that should be taken into account in future work in the IETF on the special use names registry or RFC 6761? > > If not, can you suggest changes that would get your support for advancing it? (“Send text” if possible!) > > > thanks, > Suzanne & Tim Trivial spelling nit: Sec. 4.2.2 says "unilateral use by the TOR project". The correct spelling is "Tor" (only the "T" in "Tor" should be capitalized.) Also, according to https://www.torproject.org/docs/trademark-faq.html.en, "The Tor Project" is the correct spelling of the phrase (all 3 words should have the initial letter capitalized). Cheers, -Jeremy
- [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps Suzanne Woolf
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps Jeremy Rand
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps Suzanne Woolf
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps Russ Housley
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps Ralph Droms
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps Suzanne Woolf
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps John R Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] RFC 6761 vs. 6303 WGLC for draft-ietf… John R Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] RFC 6761 vs. 6303 WGLC for draft-ietf… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps Ralph Droms
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps Avri Doria
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps Russ Housley
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps Russ Housley
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps Edward Lewis
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps Ralph Droms
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-s… Edward Lewis
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-s… Edward Lewis