IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Wed, 08 February 2017 16:27 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 807B4129C33 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 08:27:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uGkDbAjPFVId for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 08:27:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E820129BED for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 08:27:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 2147F2806C3; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 17:27:48 +0100 (CET)
Received: from relay2.nic.fr (relay2.nic.fr [192.134.4.163]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C3F42806B8; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 17:27:48 +0100 (CET)
Received: from b12.nic.fr (unknown [192.134.7.106]) by relay2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A581B3800C; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 17:27:18 +0100 (CET)
Received: by b12.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 14D2840375; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 17:27:18 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 17:27:18 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Message-ID: <20170208162718.jxaesl23jc6frykl@nic.fr>
References: <20170208091536.vqwftrhpole33opl@nic.fr> <20170208151101.14753.qmail@ary.lan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170208151101.14753.qmail@ary.lan>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 9.0
X-Kernel: Linux 4.8.0-2-amd64 x86_64
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20161126 (1.7.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/peg2PH1hjavbQhwUE562eUDDhSM>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 16:27:50 -0000

On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 03:11:01PM -0000,
 John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote 
 a message of 16 lines which said:

> Considering the vastly different ways that software handles .local
> and .onion and example.com and 10.in-addr.arpa, and that next thing
> to come along (.homenet?) will likely be different from any of the
> existing ones, this strikes me as akin to asking for a pony.

Some people in the discussion wanted ICANN to do something. This is
akin to asking for an unicorn (at least, ponies do exist).

> If you just want a list of the names so your recursive resolver can
> stub them out, we already have that, of course.

URL, please, with the expected behavior of the resolver when queried
for the domain.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email