IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Wed, 15 March 2017 19:22 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71D461317E0 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 12:22:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8klzbB4NDZap for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 12:22:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 610E31317D9 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 12:22:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD08B30048E for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 15:22:05 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id Llh7uUwAAt0Y for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 15:22:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.home (pool-108-45-101-150.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.45.101.150]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ED04F300266 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 15:22:04 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0EAC0860-CD5A-46C4-995E-B74B19FA29BE"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 15:22:04 -0400
References: <6545B2F1-15C6-41F6-ABF0-2D3E6983F4AB@gmail.com> <A36D0419-CC7C-4987-8F2B-9B682FB43290@vigilsec.com>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <A36D0419-CC7C-4987-8F2B-9B682FB43290@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <2C1E8DEF-8C80-4F49-B1FD-233751F07882@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/RHutW1Ho93-CIt8CdGapquJelKc>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 19:22:08 -0000

> Will I-D.lewis-domain-names be published as an Informational RFC as well?  If not, then the Introduction needs to extract highlights from that document.

I see that draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-03 still references I-D.lewis-domain-names, but I have not seen ant WG Last Call for that document.  What is the plan?

Russ

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email