Re: [DNSOP] RFC 6761 vs. 6303 WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Thu, 09 February 2017 20:34 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 782321294A0 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 12:34:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SkIOz3TObnWe for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 12:34:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x235.google.com (mail-qt0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EAA312706D for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 12:34:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x235.google.com with SMTP id w20so15697173qtb.1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 09 Feb 2017 12:34:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=Zeml20hty6sUhFVZC6MtP+lnV1f8i/jjhBMgUqucSic=; b=p8E/J19401+hSGjwwGWQXNNz7VQtQc4zrVRg53opLVgDgT2XrRRevq5ltTUqGy9oV5 KOPaJUrZVYSeXKMGO687Hp4GgFIrb7FpMheiVP54OSQszbfInNEq3MQoWrNrBWgcmyag 9sak7WvnFUh1vqP4wgo801G0+keil1c7CXLmKaTZBsYhc9bIQD937L0pipYJ9Z+9j95c 6BNZzv7O13lkZDTcGrhxCyLATuBM6G0aZ/PIl3kU6GZmDoLHHY18Il/NsDkkv7Ih8vwy FAtMaldJjOBGduV05j8Z74ua3bhJnH0H56G2lO/J89U4aiMssqkKK5KZnBxUiugaQn1H xd/Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=Zeml20hty6sUhFVZC6MtP+lnV1f8i/jjhBMgUqucSic=; b=C23UD250IISm/kRPAZ45LNUkN8buvBjNCshtMWdGN9j8x1UShKjhnkrnjrqZ9l7ZEd +Oy2lXrWKBkK8PYn5LKnUKgU+J7roMjDZSbbcDsqV981BpRTAPSpGXmvnRY3x6WBvZ7J dpA72SsUM2bkbAdOzR1HtPFb5nzZ5I70Eadqp8JkQ66VIwuf6qAtYvtlMEg04GfDyM1z IXH4ocmuLFlIEOU1Y8eziPDh68+Lx8fiw1cB+75bblv0eBfMz6mxQRuoK9IesQJXAGVy f15a+5+vJKnG1pSMqmWWZAZqE7tF8fD5bZ+9ZFXLN2NHsGWrxT6PybSBVyIAtXBDiz2k 4y8g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39lxrXD0htqDverLhx6V5PR5EZDEG9X+0/jtqCbtjhby5ntE1x3AfgFmfXatzt0SWg==
X-Received: by 10.200.42.200 with SMTP id c8mr5179890qta.156.1486672467691; Thu, 09 Feb 2017 12:34:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.228] (c-73-167-64-188.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [73.167.64.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a70sm10151643qkc.1.2017.02.09.12.34.26 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 09 Feb 2017 12:34:26 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <86C2B05D-7B70-46CF-938F-14DB73E60104@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_37361992-6846-41BD-B66A-B32F2B73E6B9"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 15:34:25 -0500
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.20.1702091338420.78427@ary.qy>
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
References: <20170208091536.vqwftrhpole33opl@nic.fr> <20170208151101.14753.qmail@ary.lan> <20170208162718.jxaesl23jc6frykl@nic.fr> <alpine.OSX.2.20.1702081129500.51298@ary.qy> <20170209163639.sxvw6jg6lqxsavuq@nic.fr> <alpine.OSX.2.20.1702091338420.78427@ary.qy>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/tixC8UYDYqr3Lrkig3RFZak4ejU>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] RFC 6761 vs. 6303 WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2017 20:34:30 -0000

On Feb 9, 2017, at 1:40 PM, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
> That's an interesting observation.  RFC 6761 imported the RFC 1918 zones from RFC 6303 section 4.1, but not the other zones from sections 4.2 through 4.6.  Was that deliberate of an oversight?

RFC 6761 doesn't actually reference RFC6303.   I suspect that this was indeed an oversight, although it can also be argued that there is no special need to list these zones in the special-use names registry.

But this inconsistency is certainly worthy of note.