Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Sat, 04 February 2017 23:08 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E7E712958A for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Feb 2017 15:08:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eETKso7roSx4 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Feb 2017 15:08:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x231.google.com (mail-qk0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7DE9129571 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 4 Feb 2017 15:08:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x231.google.com with SMTP id 11so24350653qkl.3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 04 Feb 2017 15:08:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=h2XuhOSC7CoQ2+b8OUTIuNFQXEw0NzuMyBTab1R5bvw=; b=VKhBouEjdIUNQ16TM3TWHbfrUTUxV63ulPFVshSxBN93hhFvHgngsP8JKJtjSyF7h1 3AZjNUmZWuG1pwrEGx4OLI17bIv0qoO7F4fNA757Umi+nkc/53LYg7+Oafovnr4AD5eg Y1YWCsNJvu1aB9Bjke6dvd8Fhhe62pRZJ+vpDtJruLBxC2SF6I5olQtLJoRZ4OylCeyI guAUBSkaqC7G1i8wl+2mnuSxjbJ3hsA8WgahH/3K2p1Jum/DO10q8SqF/sM8qLvhfBRW DFBgRFCuVfatXtMdYKglMOS6WtHJs559jEqkJjGdBkjZWBDH6SCofL8CdS2ONWP16R+U kuEQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=h2XuhOSC7CoQ2+b8OUTIuNFQXEw0NzuMyBTab1R5bvw=; b=gKYdIr4gVNXucLhLnxy/eKpkyodPHid2PoDCAj6TbwCAJntybs4jvioUn1LJVFiyiz giZSAN+ab/TST6CXHbZHJ8sZ8XJURhJu42XIKOY95cBfH8DspP8RAFpA+E4BdTLcphv3 PVSTLNiLPD2KDHUKJmXooeLHNNkAswTCn4+CnZEwlrc6wgzBS45gskOatIaG2/mdYiKy GyOfE4FvB34XEco7jeU/9k6onobPraUYBfzmvhiaz9FJ9bchN9KCnHBIGJQ4uAtcS2sd g+PCnfYOGPGUQ7Ybupk4vSAmoKUHVqJloIh77cZZZtGROYO7jd8et02DvMgtjVyunD8z skuA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39kil34G36f0Lzw/MHRabInpXfj0287LnKr9+ny4aHcv86DzbAP2WnLcrjfLaJktqrMz9jjymxni1f1eT8uj
X-Received: by 10.55.20.105 with SMTP id e102mr3369241qkh.35.1486249731771; Sat, 04 Feb 2017 15:08:51 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.12.179.19 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Feb 2017 15:08:21 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <f660f4dd-02f0-dfa6-aa76-1632d08bc668@airmail.cc>
References: <6545B2F1-15C6-41F6-ABF0-2D3E6983F4AB@gmail.com> <f660f4dd-02f0-dfa6-aa76-1632d08bc668@airmail.cc>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2017 18:08:21 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iLJMa2xGrF=ar8xkZfcivRhDohOcPNUxjDD=fyq=cfgGg@mail.gmail.com>
To: jeremy@veclabs.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/lXeTpRL6UhbeGur6YHnsJskvjBs>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2017 23:08:54 -0000

On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Jeremy Rand <jeremyrand@airmail.cc> wrote:
> Suzanne Woolf:
>> This message opens a Working Group Last Call for:
>>
>> "Special-Use Names Problem Statement"
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps/>
>> Proposed status: informational
>>
>> Starts: 2 Feb. 2017
>> Ends: 23 Feb. 2017 (3 weeks)
>>
>> Discussion should go to the mailing list.
>>
>> Is this draft ready to advance for publication as an Informational RFC, and as guidance for possible updates to RFC 6761? Does it describe the relevant issues clearly, and cover all the relevant ones that should be taken into account in future work in the IETF on the special use names registry or RFC 6761?
>>
>> If not, can you suggest changes that would get your support for advancing it? (“Send text” if possible!)
>>
>>
>> thanks,
>> Suzanne & Tim
>
> Trivial spelling nit: Sec. 4.2.2 says "unilateral use by the TOR
> project".  The correct spelling is "Tor" (only the "T" in "Tor" should
> be capitalized.)  Also, according to
> https://www.torproject.org/docs/trademark-faq.html.en, "The Tor Project"
> is the correct spelling of the phrase (all 3 words should have the
> initial letter capitalized).


Thank you very much -- Ralph added this (and Suzanne's below) to the
issue tracker. I did the easier part of addressing the nits and
closing the nitty issues. We've published a version to GitHub with
some of the nits addressed, and we will work on addressing more of the
substantive comments.

W


>
> Cheers,
> -Jeremy
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>



-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf