Re: [DNSOP] Adoption and Working Group Last Call for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-onion-tld

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Thu, 21 May 2015 03:42 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 155CB1ACED8 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 May 2015 20:42:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.663
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.663 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AaZegaWE5r8l for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 May 2015 20:42:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 802961ACEDF for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 May 2015 20:41:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 61140 invoked from network); 21 May 2015 03:42:04 -0000
Received: from unknown (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 21 May 2015 03:42:04 -0000
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 03:41:35 -0000
Message-ID: <20150521034135.67747.qmail@ary.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_i+xnC=fivaJrWs4DLLiHuy+VyOf_J7wxzfpdL3MYK153A@mail.gmail.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/4-wxdizKX3C6oZ1PUk-VI1LE2hc>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Adoption and Working Group Last Call for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-onion-tld
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 03:42:08 -0000

In article <CAHw9_i+xnC=fivaJrWs4DLLiHuy+VyOf_J7wxzfpdL3MYK153A@mail.gmail.com> you write:
>On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> wrote:
>> On 20 May 2015, at 13:12, Tim Wicinski wrote:
>>
>>> The draft can be found here:
>>>
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-appelbaum-dnsop-onion-tld/
>>>
>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-appelbaum-dnsop-onion-tld-01
>>>
>>> Please review the draft and offer relevant comments.

I've reread it and still think we should adopt it.

I share the concerns about calling .onion a TLD, but I think that's
easily fixable by calling it something like a special purpose
namespace, then going through the document and changing it where
appropriate.  When it's talking about stuff that happens through Tor,
it's a special purpose namespace, when about mitigating problems due
to leakage of queries into ordinary DNS software, that's where we say
there won't be a TLD with that name.

Yeah, in a world where everyone was prescient it'd be .onion.alt or
something like that, but we're the Internet Engineering Task Force,
not the Internet Theology Task Force.  Part of engineering is knowing
when to prefer a kludge that works over a beautiful design that won't.

R's,
John