IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Adoption and Working Group Last Call for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-onion-tld

Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> Sat, 23 May 2015 13:55 UTC

Return-Path: <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D5781ACE4F for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 May 2015 06:55:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mpJPoeV5VVhT for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 May 2015 06:55:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-f46.google.com (mail-la0-f46.google.com [209.85.215.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F9E81ACE4B for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 May 2015 06:55:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lami4 with SMTP id i4so28191858lam.0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 May 2015 06:55:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=5h/lsxhLQP/qZuf0i2FBAx3JfsFEgwcltRNiA59ovCg=; b=lCB8Lg/A06Tn81UfJv3YiFHNUEztkFi84GQOmqCalROTnQLt+gceoeyNtby5rjJMFz 6/YB6sLGWlkoVMzi00tD3ilKLb6bNn+4uXViyniVCgYDXYjxbS2ihhSalmNfIuVFikOD YG4kFayvB2MhAniJqrLrXEAO5VGLND7RQZQJRHpP8Ld71iN26rc2tmT+pTKv+v8skDST Ws5CmITYkr6EPoCpJkSJEOCvt9eqOUccKrY6AspPxyKMx3pMN6vGzJ9Tsebjaln2zco7 z1LsG3r4LXmtr+XMCA3aA96WgG1cIuPGyQQkDK+FEYFT7iNE7QT2B/m9Pe0JqgJEksJ7 8OOA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn5U4eLraU7+GrS0slfUoAelhhQtYVvCaHmDM94oEFmRAwNLZlRUMr4fh88eD+YzAfZTS6Z
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.122.98 with SMTP id lr2mr10651829lbb.68.1432389306231; Sat, 23 May 2015 06:55:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.25.214.162 with HTTP; Sat, 23 May 2015 06:55:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.11.1505211519210.32468@ary.lan>
References: <20150521034135.67747.qmail@ary.lan> <DDD750B2-91C9-4818-B04A-933A721728E4@fb.com> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1505211519210.32468@ary.lan>
Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 09:55:06 -0400
Message-ID: <CAL02cgSCQj0TRUQbAPx_U5PVuZ+zEnxxhAOGvHFFz9FP3tNLSw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7bf0d9fac7468b0516c01f50"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/7ztfqiarYTLa77VuOxS7hPwzK68>
Cc: Alec Muffett <alecm@fb.com>, "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Adoption and Working Group Last Call for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-onion-tld
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 13:55:12 -0000

On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 3:20 PM, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

> It would be a shame for them to nitpick the rules because "special purpose
>> namespace" != "TLD"?
>>
>
> Is the CAB really likely to waste its time on that?  I don't know them, I
> have no idea.  I'd hope they had better things to worry about if it's
> abundantly clear whether we've declared .onion to be special.
>

Speaking with my "CAB Forum member" hat on, I would be happy to make the
argument there that they should allow CAs to issue for special purpose
names, as long as they follow validation procedures appropriate to each
special-purpose namespace.  (Though clearly, I can't guarantee an outcome.)

The critical thing is having a clear designation, rather than the ambiguity
we have now.

--Richard


>
> Regards,
> John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
> Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email