Re: [DNSOP] Adoption and Working Group Last Call for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-onion-tld

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Thu, 21 May 2015 19:21 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5CCA1A8908 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 May 2015 12:21:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pt8SM6lcZxMI for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 May 2015 12:21:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com [64.89.234.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91EC31A8907 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 May 2015 12:21:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-04.win.nominum.com [64.89.235.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39CE8DA00A8; Thu, 21 May 2015 19:21:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.0.1.29] (8.20.190.66) by CAS-04.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.224.2; Thu, 21 May 2015 12:21:14 -0700
References: <20150521034135.67747.qmail@ary.lan> <DDD750B2-91C9-4818-B04A-933A721728E4@fb.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <DDD750B2-91C9-4818-B04A-933A721728E4@fb.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <589B9950-8311-49CF-9E28-DB0E7C9D7401@nominum.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (12F69)
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 15:21:13 -0400
To: Alec Muffett <alecm@fb.com>
X-Originating-IP: [8.20.190.66]
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/fOBK84kpyTWfmTS_r3o4GAU20TY>
Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Adoption and Working Group Last Call for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-onion-tld
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 19:21:22 -0000

On May 21, 2015, at 3:10 PM, Alec Muffett <alecm@fb.com> wrote:
> It would be a shame for them to nitpick the rules because "special purpose namespace" != "TLD"?

It would make sense to call it a reserved special-use top-level domain name.   It's not a top-level domain in the DNS, though.   I think that's the distinction to make.