IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] moving forward on special use names

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Tue, 20 September 2016 11:30 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5130412B29A for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 04:30:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QnklneHenBAI for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 04:30:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x230.google.com (mail-lf0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08FBD12B273 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 04:30:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x230.google.com with SMTP id g62so10727116lfe.3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 04:30:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=JUI1zUTutSzw8BAs3saf2HgMto9ugWkOkofXW6SaiGg=; b=WGJ6tXB7050lsPoIhl/RPhIUhasI7qTaNReocs2yz25+hR1U4RoEsUsY/I0j6VJyLd mh/tP8FeNSJbh78QrXdgSfSEwgrjhvvIjzyQrCbuHRy+Qv6vTgqzxPt1jrVssGEpGdm0 Vxfk0+sHb/xEFibC90hyFLU00ETSo4aj/PirPeww1hV8Ad0nIp2odkh+7JpzRTtmjhS7 vHSWzb7dvXi5Y5YYig53peQtOTMUZwVWhCKwbWmUDJ5Zgl8tT/A6b3Oym/gJrVFF9QXm 9RQqUm3Erjyk8Z5/TkpeRU6F03BchH3rtsgIx1mm/hxCtegJzOYZMybVPzCjFyGe9Zqf nrmg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=JUI1zUTutSzw8BAs3saf2HgMto9ugWkOkofXW6SaiGg=; b=O+Z/diV5W7hsehYPKikyeaAXwUP6qTEWxnPvUErzDd7egiKoxlwBYmHElo3p51U8rz FwoU5TVGRUrOS2C1VH+TId2UJR3RBZXOGp0Kv1LMZzevWy1Gcqs9vFOnJ6Z5l4BFUabp YrjHs2mIJDHaLYw6tsfr3nIDNUZ003s7gPre7uCk+Ql/1hNUqlh2HIJl9vUke5yvswVY QQW4r4FETijNsYLjcHiGBStjZm09bM+rroNaIKkEHk7Z9Kr6SmnfVOyoqoTDb1Iy+TyU IiL59jCGaqGxrKMH8vsKUV9RY4YH6MSZYrYWb6xlgjMaW5Fog2DqboFf5YfxQZvDXnjn z03w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwOQK9v9k0Y7OO83SKN5A4w9WtlBm0IYdjJglmNqdCkIeflO0ag61ZYSKC+2EZX0tZ6Vkldq/1vJyexTkw==
X-Received: by 10.25.17.34 with SMTP id g34mr7580155lfi.181.1474371027053; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 04:30:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.217.93 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 04:29:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <0AD4FFFB-EBF5-4CDE-B29C-3220D1DBA111@davecake.net>
References: <CAPt1N1=xNaHpO-ZxusWK9_UBzOpKa0zk0y0h7iGvRS2P=Og-3g@mail.gmail.com> <20160918234346.78983.qmail@ary.lan> <CAPt1N1nOMUA0ZNQioZ7wngDE6gSjJn_qroBv2a2kdsvFMKngHg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1609182047100.7288@ary.lan> <0AD4FFFB-EBF5-4CDE-B29C-3220D1DBA111@davecake.net>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 07:29:46 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1k8hP90EUUXNAYbK1rLofUwnriDe00qBBYy_exPHLoFRg@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Cake <dave@davecake.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1140672e55c050053ceec1ba"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/FcYSX9ovNrSfLxPq6NsuBMotuQA>
Cc: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] moving forward on special use names
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 11:30:33 -0000

What is out of scope of the problem statement is saying what to do about
them. :)

On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 5:32 AM, David Cake <dave@davecake.net> wrote:

> I tend to think that they may be within scope for the problem statement,
> but it is likely that existing solutions (e.g. ICANN refusing to delegate
> them while they remain toxic) are adequate to deal with the problem.
>
> David
>
> > On 19 Sep 2016, at 8:47 AM, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Dealing with toxic waste names is out of scope for the problem
> statement.
> >
> > Well, that's one theory.  Let's see of other people agree.
> >
> > R's,
> > John
> >
> > Regards,
> > John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
> > Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail.
> https://jl.ly
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > DNSOP mailing list
> > DNSOP@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email