IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Asking TLDs to perform checks.

"Joe Abley" <jabley@hopcount.ca> Wed, 11 November 2015 20:56 UTC

Return-Path: <jabley@hopcount.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7C251B39F1 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 12:56:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3nesQQwbQKhn for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 12:56:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yk0-x235.google.com (mail-yk0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD6921A9025 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 12:56:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ykdr82 with SMTP id r82so70101406ykd.3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 12:56:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hopcount.ca; s=google; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type; bh=Q7vCGQbVfkBHgXR5TZ/wl1wwwELMI5omL6psoPD1MBs=; b=hs8jEKmW+hj/RcCziEy2zYFKEWHVTXiOa0oScTMpGDDVX5fsJV/5hPK5LX1Z13lLzJ zo6m1lykG9IOQ0JJP7xJ9ooI5FrZPTuzuwhaDszcnfaA6soil/531EmSw6hfWfJk+w49 Vqs35J8n0c8stbWRxGZFG4gNRP469eq/Iqne8=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type; bh=Q7vCGQbVfkBHgXR5TZ/wl1wwwELMI5omL6psoPD1MBs=; b=YGuvUBYcD+l7H+FD/sM18doG8yEeO6WEEB97O6t48bEzJ3gwsQjBkXMHzuRU0Bm/aW C6IdAC52hB/VY+9II+xdRIdz/i/y4nnAotu9aYE1pULEC6Og+n8i2crTClIpjFjYhRWe 8Of5EtxGRvQL+dble748lDYTdp9WYxukYICrWqYp1fqwU0UoJGRcSMsqn3QonYRSsfgY 3guBcl6IQAKMka4NSjqYIs5tJ+edUoRd5jpDkTbhhzDtZS/Lt2YUwo9ZK/DBANby4kM4 F1Ftu7ZUyMx5Ur1dHl/CJayZXInyjuxcFD6f+/dddAYPDhLqnCLoRSjiuavclAXNfU3r MsIQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm03m7y0lzP3kLBH+HQ4uRPH116zNAAV1cnOVtgGGYIkJ+eQknVg8p0naR7Iq9P0TVDv7/H
X-Received: by 10.13.245.134 with SMTP id e128mr11801768ywf.24.1447275368971; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 12:56:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.19.131.98] ([209.117.45.10]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z7sm12725431ywf.15.2015.11.11.12.56.07 for <dnsop@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Nov 2015 12:56:08 -0800 (PST)
From: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
To: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 15:56:07 -0500
Message-ID: <49561F23-5408-4B18-B8D0-06C866D58F28@hopcount.ca>
In-Reply-To: <20151111180525.GF24882@mournblade.imrryr.org>
References: <20151105235402.39FFC3BF2F29@rock.dv.isc.org> <20151110152511.6f1a1c20@pallas.home.time-travellers.org> <20151110204330.C47C63C7D699@rock.dv.isc.org> <7B4B7DEA-C705-437E-8BC1-64D96D55014E@vpnc.org> <0F2DD78A-69C4-49DA-936F-C32D0FC97CC2@rfc1035.com> <5373DDAB-1ED2-489B-AB62-BA7CF6D3DB48@frobbit.se> <31988EDD-B2F3-4244-A75B-CAA2937A5B01@insensate.co.uk> <20151111180525.GF24882@mournblade.imrryr.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.2r5141)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/kCJkEnaB9djDdJ7g38I90uu2QtY>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Asking TLDs to perform checks.
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 20:56:11 -0000


On 11 Nov 2015, at 13:05, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 12:22:05PM +0000, Lawrence Conroy wrote:
>
>> ISTM that the IETF isn't in a position to force its suggestions 
>> through
>> the 'industry'.
>
> Who said anything about "forcing", I thought this was intended to
> be a BCP.  As for whether the checks are done by registries or
> registrars: ideally both!

If this thread is really going to continue, in defiance of all logic and 
common sense, can we at least remove the apostrophe from the subject 
line? It makes me twitch.


Joe

v2.14.0 | Report a Bug | By Email