IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Asking TLD's to perform checks.

"Patrik Fältström " <paf@frobbit.se> Wed, 11 November 2015 10:29 UTC

Return-Path: <paf@frobbit.se>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B358B1A889F for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 02:29:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.261
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.261 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wo3j1UsSBd_E for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 02:29:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.frobbit.se (mail.frobbit.se [IPv6:2a02:80:3ffe::176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA7741A888E for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 02:29:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.71.80.131] (unknown [31.15.50.130]) by mail.frobbit.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 618D2247B1; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:29:42 +0100 (CET)
From: Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se>
To: Havard Eidnes <he@uninett.no>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:29:41 +0100
Message-ID: <116E7C47-DBA3-4131-B305-B82AE6B8417A@frobbit.se>
In-Reply-To: <20151111.111735.41519120.he@uninett.no>
References: <5373DDAB-1ED2-489B-AB62-BA7CF6D3DB48@frobbit.se> <20151111064744.GW18315@mournblade.imrryr.org> <314D2303-5654-4BA3-A190-F658DAF60E31@frobbit.se> <20151111.111735.41519120.he@uninett.no>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=_MailMate_D03169CA-FE80-43D2-8DF7-034AA64A85C0_="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.3r5164)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/xca3Rxwq5AT_edgnvDeLNUJW09I>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Asking TLD's to perform checks.
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:29:44 -0000

On 11 Nov 2015, at 11:17, Havard Eidnes wrote:

> A zone registered with delegation records, but where none of the
> name servers respond to queries for the zone does noone any good,
> so why must it be acceptable?

Because only registration of the domain name is what is wanted.

No one want records in the DNS for the domain name. No one asks for such things. Except the registry in some cases.

Some registries even requires MX records at the zone apex! Even more weird.

   Patrik

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email