Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-05.txt

Ralf Weber <dns@fl1ger.de> Thu, 20 May 2021 18:29 UTC

Return-Path: <dns@fl1ger.de>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EA4E3A21AD for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 May 2021 11:29:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WXSV0e1cZWYG for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 May 2021 11:29:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.guxx.net (nyx.guxx.net [85.10.208.173]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D16703A21B5 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 May 2021 11:29:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by nyx.guxx.net (Postfix, from userid 107) id 013FD5F4237A; Thu, 20 May 2021 18:29:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.42.95] (p4fc21d7b.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.194.29.123]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by nyx.guxx.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2759F5F4026A; Thu, 20 May 2021 18:29:41 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Ralf Weber" <dns@fl1ger.de>
To: "Eric Orth" <ericorth=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: WG <dnsop@ietf.org>, "Brian Dickson" <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>, "Martin Thomson" <mt@lowentropy.net>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 20:29:40 +0200
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.2r5673)
Message-ID: <91F79DA0-4BD9-414C-973D-024F3583F3EB@fl1ger.de>
In-Reply-To: <CAMOjQcF=K_Dkya7yamKECxHjmsEVHmLyoaoF3KRnCXqPde4wSw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <7ADF1FB2-97A4-4C49-8F25-8BF03BE01640@hopcount.ca> <20210512213903.D5F1F7AA827@ary.qy> <CAMOjQcFJjcsvaREF0fr+2GTY4zTy5CxSxR16BEp=Nc-K9WJ0Tg@mail.gmail.com> <CAH1iCipAVKVCuH2ME=+YpeJyijrKCtzJaU3bRFyy1f48EB33iw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHbrMsCjWgV7nc575L_qdvr7HdoEVKqkXRwLdXA2L5NiCgdvwA@mail.gmail.com> <CAH1iCipW_-BSMQZ-S+m18pyzfxTGsCrmG9Pc-b35_VRiLhxh4w@mail.gmail.com> <CAHbrMsDvEkYAxee4xjW5LsQmr0PgBf+UmMAuME-_UvRMg4jJeA@mail.gmail.com> <CAH1iCiq4zJZBv5=f7T2EDRWKa7bAZx66SMKkf+AiDsDPTZokhQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHbrMsAW_wtKmRDYKZVUrFLZYuM_DqoS-8VRMf-O0Z8WpPBfbg@mail.gmail.com> <CAKC-DJj3nPAZp=qpwjBJ_3yG_EO-q-bcJbaizUNw9uq6deVZjg@mail.gmail.com> <C3734365-D5F7-4F9A-A463-5EFBB841A583@apple.com> <CAH1iCiod61M5aHnF_qrpP6=Oc3nBL+McaSui5NUnLd1GbS=okw@mail.gmail.com> <CAH1iCipcjnHdBcc7VCpLr9rP6vbbTHKYPHtqBkQu_achzpohcg@mail.gmail.com> <D10F7DCD-71AE-4AFC-9835-C9E1F03D831F@icann.org> <CAH1iCiphr71C0MjhP-amR4S5FpDzKc4qkDvsU3qMXhdLNhiwyw@mail.gmail.com> <CAH1iCiqSFk0XP_We+cUfe0xFvmDMusPc3weHxSK-e5CLT6jLwg@mail.gmail.com> <CAKC-DJhH=OK_mraWK1pVEx6a_hiPSPF-KQwd+mDy_2mg_a17CQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAH1iCip=Y0MTh4=ATqWPdWSDot4dmBge96Y-cdL86hk3dk3ddg@mail.gmail.com> <9a138693-60a0-4b75-99f5-6a7544f935a0@www.fastmail.com> <CAH1iCirdY4HWj1o8X3mEkPJODrQZ391YsuC75Hs5m5G4PM3ATA@mail.gmail.com> <1A6728DB-72CB-425E-90D7-38159DC8D4FB@fl1ger.de> <CAMOjQcF=K_Dkya7yamKECxHjmsEVHmLyoaoF3KRnCXqPde4wSw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/nAhA2xTA7vfRAAhYHKbjbLI4ZaA>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-05.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 18:29:53 -0000

Moin!

On 20 May 2021, at 19:59, Eric Orth wrote:

> A big selling point behind why we have client implementers planning to
> query HTTPS records is the expectation that this will be the only query
> type we will need to add and that it can be extended to handle any future
> information we need for establishing HTTPS connections (and we want
> mechanisms to be able to add stuff in the future to keep improving HTTPS
> connection behavior).  It is not practical to add too many additional DNS
> queries to make web requests, and nobody wants a
> deprecation/new-SVCB-based-record-type cycle every time we need to add
> something.  So in the end, I do not expect HTTPS would see much adoption
> without the extensibility.
I fully agree. The point I was making is that ECH sort of already is an
extension that were not in the original draft and there may be other
Enhancements in the future.

So long
-Ralf
——-
Ralf Weber