IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-05.txt

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> Mon, 10 May 2021 23:20 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAA863A2EC8 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 May 2021 16:20:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FBVEzw9rfJVo for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 May 2021 16:20:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppa4.dc.icann.org (ppa4.dc.icann.org [192.0.46.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E3753A2EC9 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 May 2021 16:20:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MBX112-E2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (out.mail.icann.org [64.78.33.7]) by ppa4.dc.icann.org (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with ESMTPS id 14ANKbhm001440 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 May 2021 23:20:38 GMT
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.128) by MBX112-W2-CO-2.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.130) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.858.5; Mon, 10 May 2021 16:20:37 -0700
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org ([10.226.41.128]) by MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org ([10.226.41.128]) with mapi id 15.02.0858.010; Mon, 10 May 2021 16:20:37 -0700
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [DNSOP] [Ext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-05.txt
Thread-Index: AQHXO6R2YAMi99z2YEWrYLGKwIWwLqrQzMYAgACXiQCAARuvAIABr8mAgAAThgCAAtmpgIAAJ3GAgAAjKwCAAOvjAIAAXHqAgALkOACAAGuHgIAAU+mAgAAEbACAAQbJgIAAA2aAgAAWvoCAAGG6gIAAB9WAgAABu4A=
Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 23:20:37 +0000
Message-ID: <554EF35D-E06B-4F7B-9DDA-90DA8470F6F3@icann.org>
References: <F4CE48A1-7AB0-45D0-97FF-158CE3A04EE1@icann.org> <3EE971EE-0777-44D6-9CD2-771B92FFE938@hopcount.ca> <1d822219-8ab9-2cb7-d0a4-9b8afc39058d@powerdns.com> <2952D408-117B-40D0-B859-7A8E4111629E@hopcount.ca> <CAHbrMsD+uiaYQ8i58VRjF=3AtW9uAoAtgbKzNzrPZC3QCmD2pQ@mail.gmail.com> <25971B7D-718C-42E3-8F04-2D235776C66B@icann.org> <4312DB4B-A9E0-48E8-BD79-7358080065F4@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <4312DB4B-A9E0-48E8-BD79-7358080065F4@isc.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.0.32.234]
x-source-routing-agent: Processed
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_78D7574B-7DF0-402D-8403-12E16D9D5197"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.391, 18.0.761 definitions=2021-05-10_14:2021-05-10, 2021-05-10 signatures=0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/z_9RUZ3N-zST5aU7Ko84RUBIEQY>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-05.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 23:20:45 -0000

On May 10, 2021, at 4:14 PM, Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote:
> Actually, the process problem is that record format keeps changing AFTER the code point has been assigned and the record format THEORETICALLY been FIXED.

Mark makes an excellent point, one that people in the DNS world routinely forget. 

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email