Re: [Emailcore] Delivered-To issues

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Fri, 01 January 2021 22:17 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF8F13A0D43 for <emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jan 2021 14:17:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.85
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.85 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=Tibp1i+N; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=smImYFBN
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c9cgrEGtl8mY for <emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jan 2021 14:17:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E4903A0D45 for <emailcore@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Jan 2021 14:17:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 50504 invoked from network); 1 Jan 2021 22:17:24 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=c546.5fef9f74.k2101; bh=aY5knwoiSiLrgXV+PMcsguBiOpm3Kvofv4+ZGE2PksA=; b=Tibp1i+Nkgtam6pC4Ny/4gIa/lFtzq2qtCtqL1xNnxwJh2RTGag4EN+eaJ4zoZfw7F5qGKPoTg2gLRws2z1bcVfA9SOZnHYEUyWy/G+v0vMNs4Zr1NHShZU5tmgeO5AgEdxAnwbYtD+HxJvFtV7r1kMv8nDt98ywNVHVgFSA3acJjVX+56Jr5AHuV3pHdegd8WC/FawJBR72JBGMqCpbbRvLWfJF0JJpUrpr8N4yO2flzcQWgyhopVKF7I/EMqNojkyKa2kOvpI2OfZrN2yrIEbQMBEWZe+zef5vIxpub0gByB1vj6FwxytG1s7tHMiSdpo7fpNvPM+s2YR23/fzjQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=c546.5fef9f74.k2101; bh=aY5knwoiSiLrgXV+PMcsguBiOpm3Kvofv4+ZGE2PksA=; b=smImYFBNi/wAiFNDmzIH2yQ7ekk2geZqsPJfVa8zNLrG0Gukx+teDxphdtTbu2sGlw16tquzfSCnjOKNU2I2r10/RnqnekKBAEpMYZGoEfyTT0qZkhXzxvNtNL0lgLkEKRJjyUh6IPJ/PvYeMi2ups5+BE26QqK+IVRIspSNIQOsLCXVwZiX5n1HR8XOT37RCONcKb/bXzGTxkX1CAN6vIMqmcEUXTzc/AsldsJvUU2hMfpGT5ohKxUCx0YrlFFdYF0avp9EHmrb6lVFi/HlQ4NT3kMFouRKEfQfuHy82Q8aYLtm/0f9D1VXw9cHi215WJ8d1KSTq4hlE4Mkv8RIHg==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 01 Jan 2021 22:17:24 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id ED67D45047D9; Fri, 1 Jan 2021 17:17:23 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2021 17:17:23 -0500
Message-Id: <20210101221723.ED67D45047D9@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: emailcore@ietf.org
Cc: dcrocker@bbiw.net
In-Reply-To: <def122c9-1eec-8828-6c17-1adb8d4c5ed9@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emailcore/4evO4-XVGtbSC-mIscaoO5-IXKI>
Subject: Re: [Emailcore] Delivered-To issues
X-BeenThere: emailcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: EMAILCORE proposed working group list <emailcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emailcore>, <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emailcore/>
List-Post: <mailto:emailcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emailcore>, <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2021 22:17:28 -0000

In article <def122c9-1eec-8828-6c17-1adb8d4c5ed9@dcrocker.net> you write:
>      Should the recipient's MUA have access to the /sequence/ of RCPT TO
>      addresses used to get to them?

If we're documenting existing practice, which I think would be a good idea, yes.

R's,
John