Re: [Emailcore] Return-Path and Delivered-To issue

Claus Assmann <ml+emailcore@esmtp.org> Wed, 06 January 2021 04:53 UTC

Return-Path: <ca+envelope@esmtp.org>
X-Original-To: emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65ACA3A0FBD for <emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 20:53:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JR4W_jZRKxA2 for <emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 20:53:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kiel.esmtp.org (kiel.esmtp.org [195.244.235.220]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E73F63A0FB3 for <emailcore@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 20:53:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kiel.esmtp.org (localhost. [127.0.0.1]) by kiel.esmtp.org (MeTA1-1.1.Alpha15.2) with ESMTPS (TLS=TLSv1.2, cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384, bits=256, verify=OK) id S000000000004131200; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 05:53:34 +0100
Received: (from ca@localhost) by kiel.esmtp.org (8.16.0.41/8.12.10.Beta0/Submit) id 1064rYlI079817 for emailcore@ietf.org; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 05:53:34 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2021 05:53:34 +0100
From: Claus Assmann <ml+emailcore@esmtp.org>
To: emailcore@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20210106045334.GA13200@kiel.esmtp.org>
Reply-To: emailcore@ietf.org
Mail-Followup-To: emailcore@ietf.org
References: <4bc00e40-8a18-0c8c-bf1e-672e91da2330@dcrocker.net> <def122c9-1eec-8828-6c17-1adb8d4c5ed9@dcrocker.net> <0ea03115-8730-1759-58ec-a4fbcd8508e6@dcrocker.net> <acd7b050-068b-3797-ade7-ac7eb4c930c9@wizmail.org> <B912224B736BAA795EBC1961@PSB> <f6399eaa-ec58-bfeb-e232-0646df41a979@wizmail.org> <CD5B84B3DC49D3B4E56A1397@PSB> <9f27f29f-2b4e-57ad-3d54-c2a5e04d8c62@tana.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <9f27f29f-2b4e-57ad-3d54-c2a5e04d8c62@tana.it>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emailcore/VX2_VvTCsUWeoD2mB0wHOTSAuz4>
Subject: Re: [Emailcore] Return-Path and Delivered-To issue
X-BeenThere: emailcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: EMAILCORE proposed working group list <emailcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emailcore>, <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emailcore/>
List-Post: <mailto:emailcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emailcore>, <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2021 04:53:38 -0000

On Tue, Jan 05, 2021, Alessandro Vesely wrote:

>    When the delivery SMTP server makes the "final delivery" of a
>    message, it inserts a return-path line at the beginning of the mail
>    data.

> Although the reasons for doing so are well explained, and are part of SMTP
> because of the reliability implications, inserting Return-Path: really looks
> like an MDA's job, not MTA's.  Perhaps, the text should say something like:

sendmail has an option for this:

   5.4.  M -- Define Mailer
...
      P  This mailer wants a "Return-Path:" line.

i.e., the MTA can provide that line for/to the MDA.

Hence: please do not change the text.

-- 
Address is valid for this mailing list only, please do not reply
to it direcly, but to the list.