Re: [Emailcore] Delivered-To issues

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Thu, 31 December 2020 22:33 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D76583A0C6A for <emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Dec 2020 14:33:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.85
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.85 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=X346BSj5; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=kcCnPZuZ
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FUqHfOQPuxSy for <emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Dec 2020 14:33:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18DE33A0C62 for <emailcore@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Dec 2020 14:33:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 80903 invoked from network); 31 Dec 2020 22:33:40 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=13c05.5fee51c4.k2012; bh=g3pWCYupR7pnCCTYlmTJbc/qoJ7ML+qAO6Klt9Y6S08=; b=X346BSj5mUyUEUpqzoxTT1cMQC4npnnhclJSFjpMrxyWC5hvasVmuKh9CDFwAsInew8YT675jQHVWz6v5KqcokLiaCiJpUfCb/rgmeqJQac2/7RE0JF5lIXxBPXAEkd9B14+8MWkc/QZAymFGthKNUkl55Z70QQHpJi7JkBiskzmL/vUMG4K6lKqFPJXSady2gp/0Ucb8DXMcEhcASaJLln9a8DhQkKPCh7dUTAM2m1MeLmAUPwhonyfP9yWszaEsJkwhzqHLQjCkwWDvUE2O9I/FYr8qTUnxHd+AU9FA4cM6pIyHIZIy5uQ5VI5L7vn1NBop6yul0v1Wg099KjFBg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=13c05.5fee51c4.k2012; bh=g3pWCYupR7pnCCTYlmTJbc/qoJ7ML+qAO6Klt9Y6S08=; b=kcCnPZuZCiYSJrNK1/jpCvJzCmcO/zVlp2oZ44lcOnN54AFcJOmp7hoKDhANKczrEUeLqMkNiPZpAjacYpN4nKdOKea6C+6WU3lvyxO7OdJ+hTdwffey8BAR9JjdEyF+E2yg2Glw/mgD4fSOAiiksBR75bvY9gDC26To6gZhNaqDkI5f/hHz/3rAkrhhmmcNvUKaRrNuS1ifKl2MCX0WrNuZK7FphSwUc7SL3cGL2d7LPs0HSPU6NOLSrIzH0B6halqcUUMkGSNJ07Fd21xYHCnIjWSIJ53LXDvTVEWXvAywLx6+rVD/IGHnU+F8r6q0V7fo+0T+QIc2ZwFvbvt5NQ==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 31 Dec 2020 22:33:40 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id D22303F108F2; Thu, 31 Dec 2020 17:33:39 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2020 17:33:39 -0500
Message-Id: <20201231223339.D22303F108F2@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: emailcore@ietf.org
Cc: dcrocker@bbiw.net
In-Reply-To: <4bc00e40-8a18-0c8c-bf1e-672e91da2330@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emailcore/PsUs_mALxrkz40MXkvWNNDBURhY>
Subject: Re: [Emailcore] Delivered-To issues
X-BeenThere: emailcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: EMAILCORE proposed working group list <emailcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emailcore>, <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emailcore/>
List-Post: <mailto:emailcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emailcore>, <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2020 22:33:45 -0000

In article <4bc00e40-8a18-0c8c-bf1e-672e91da2330@dcrocker.net> you write:
>I think I've got enough information to formulate an initial draft, for 
>people to shoot at, except for:
>
>
>1.  Why a separate header field, rather than Received's FOR clause?

What jck said, the mailbox into which a message is delivered often has
a different name from what was in the RCPT TO.  That's particularly
likely on systems that handle mail for multiple domains.

>2. What should it say about delivery to multiple recipients?
>
>    The easiest -- and probably most problematic, for some systems that 
>share access to a single copy of the message -- is to say it must only 
>contain one address.  If the spec says something else, what should it 
>be, and why?

I think at this point we'd be making stuff up because I've never seen a
Delivered-To for multiple recipients.  I'm inclined to follow what sec
4.4 of RFC5321 says and only report one recipient address.

R's,
John